#Rudy Campos Stalks #RICKY MUNDAY Then Meets #SGV News 1st

Rudy Campos Stalks Ricky Munday Then Meets SGV News 1st Rudy Campos has been stalking Ricky Munday for doing what Ricky does, recording the cops. But theres more to this because Rudy Campos has been targeting Ricky ever since Ricky Filed a Complaint for Rudy Campos Conduct.

Shout out to sgv and crew for backing me up and coming out Friday

Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWkwW8xZBqqXjB4teSo5fPg/join

** (Disclaimer: This video content is intended for educational and informational purposes only) **

Author: phillyfinest369

ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2020 | HOSTING BY PHILLYFINEST369 SERVER STATS| & THE IDIOTS ROBOT AND CONTROL INC. |(RSS FEED MODULE)| ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS (phillyfinest369.com)

39 thoughts on “#Rudy Campos Stalks #RICKY MUNDAY Then Meets #SGV News 1st

  1. Liked. Commented. Most important I’m sharing it and so should you. Campos is a special kind of stupid calling for immediate attention. That SGV and Rick got together on this is epic in itself. But besides that, Rick identified another idiot cop in desperate need of remedial training. In case you missed it this stop is in response to a complaint about previous violent behavior by Campos. Do your part and get the word out before Rudy gets his dirty hands on more children.

  2. those of u unaware, our federal attny general, Mr Merrick Garland, has announced an investigation, of a very specific police force ( in the state of minnesota ) n i am not at this moment ( interested ) in attempting to spell , the name of the city; I can, defintitely spell , ( near-perfectly ); but prefer, to move on, it's undetermined ] what his intent is, other than he's said ( pattern n practice ) [ something bout wrong or wrong doing, idunno n tis not important ( to me ), tho of course [ these very specific ] details, facts, r very important to him, Mr Garland, n to many other ppl;

    Lawrence Wilson Foy dob2.10.1954 Chateauroux France [ signature valid in any court ] [ signed LWF ] 4.26.2021 in Terlingua Tx;

  3. i prefer ( threaded ) msgs, posts, notes [whatever] but due to the FACT, some of my notes r begin deleted, 'tis not always ( practical ) since if one notes DELETED, ( omg ) i [ could ] * POTENTIALLY * lose more ( work product ) than is [ ffeasible ] for me to be risking; I ask everyone who finds ( unthreaded ) notes to be tiresome, or otherwise annoying, upseting, ( even possibly, disruptive ) to consider tieh importance of my work; ( which ) i will be posting ( more in depth ) notes, explaining, as time permits, n as i'm able to create the wrds; ( thx for your complicance, in this area );

    Lawrence Wilson Foy dob2.10.1954 Chateauroux France [ signature valid in any court ] [ signed LWF ] 4.26.2021 in Terlingua Tx;

  4. Usually I don't like the kind of cop watching where there's just a lot of insults and intentional provoking, but these cops are clearly harassing Ricky Munday, so let them have it.

  5. Mr Merrick Garlaand sir,

    in 9th grade my algebra teacher ast sliverbrook or brooke with an e sir, shared the same name Miss or Ms Monday, i beleive that's how she spelled her. name; I suspect she saw overt signs i was an abused child, based on the facts, i'm not going to describe here; I already have a criminal complaint lodged ( here sir ) on the iternet ( for either 8th or 9th ) grade, for suspending me from school sir, thus denying me an educaton sir; Male hair , touching my shirt collar. The pricncipa or vice p Mr Fields , n various numerous additional issues to state the following demad sir;

    Mr Merrick Galrand sir, our property taxes sir; The largest chunck ( typically ) is to support government funded education sir; It is IMPERATIVE u [ sir ] shut dn and dismantle our Dept of Education[ s ] everywhere within the United States; If u like u may consult both Ms Monday n Mr Gary Fields ( both were ) aware i was an abused child as earl as age 14 and did nothing to save me from that envronment sir; Also, the next year Badger ( dunno ) even the rest of the schools name sir, ( this town ) West Bend, Wisconsin had some extremely anomalous movement of students ( tho thas not part of my complaint ) [ it did further adversely impact ] the instability ( our United States ) ] government ] caused by allowing my dad to move as often as we did while he was a soldier sir;

    But my additoinal complaint ( Badger school ) sir u r already aware, it involved Dennis Gnerlich ( when i was in the 10th ) grade; He sucker punched me, knockng me unconsious briefly ( while my hands were mos likely in my pockets sir; I feel to the concrete floor, and was left there ( for dead ) abadnoned inside Badger School sir; I began picking up the books i have ( typically ) tucked beneath my arm, and neither Dennis or (2) other students who witnessed this n likely [ set me up ] ( for Mr Gnerlich ) to attempt to pre-mediatedly murder me sir;

    Lawrence Wilson Foy dob 2.10.1954 Chateauroux France [ signature valid in any court ] [ signed LWF ] 4.25.2021 in Terlingua Tx;

  6. I lived in rosemead for many years.. Rode the bike trail to the santa fe dam weekly.. If these cops are serious they could sit on the trail and write 100’s of citations a day on riders from down south.. Noone gets a city license for their bike.. let alone all the little kids on their bikes…

  7. Toggle navigation

    Opinions 

    RECAP Archive

    Oral Arguments

    Judges

    Visualizations 

    Cited By (0) 

    This case has not yet been cited in our system.

     Get Citation AlertsToggle Dropdown

    Authorities (5)

    This opinion cites:

    Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs., 436 … (1 time)

    National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Morgan, 536 U.S. 101 (1 time)

    David K. Huskey v. City of San Jose Joan Gallo … (1 time)

    Action Apartment Ass'n v. SANTA MONICA RENT CONTR. BOARD, 509 … (1 time)

    Blair v. Bethel School Dist., 608 F.3d 540 (9th Cir. 2010) (1 time)

    View All Authorities

    Share

            

     

    Rudy Campos v. City of Irwindale, 13-55439 (9th Cir. 2015)

    Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

    Filed: February 19th, 2015

    Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

    Citations: None known

    Docket Number: 13-55439

    Nature of suit: Civil

    Download Original 

    NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FEB 19 2015 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS RUDY CAMPOS, No. 13-55439 Plaintiff – Appellant, D.C. No. 2:12-cv-05805-JGB- MRW v. CITY OF IRWINDALE, a municipal MEMORANDUM* corporation; and MARIO CAMACHO, individually and as Lieutenant for the Irwindale Police Department, Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Jesus G. Bernal, District Judge, Presiding Submitted February 12, 2015** Pasadena, California * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: GRABER and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges, and MOLLOY,*** Senior District Judge. Rudy Campos appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Mario Camacho and the City of Irwindale in this § 1983 action. Campos claims that Camacho and the City of Irwindale wrongfully retaliated against him for exercising his First Amendment rights at a meeting of the Irwindale Police Officers’ Association (IPOA) on July 3, 2008. Campos asserts that the retaliatory acts took two forms: (1) poor performance evaluations, and (2) withholding of overtime shifts. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. 1. The district court properly excluded the asserted adverse employment actions that occurred before July 5, 2010, due to California’s two-year statute of limitations for § 1983 claims. Action Apartment Ass’n v. Santa Monica Rent Control Bd., 509 F.3d 1020, 1026-27 (9th Cir. 2007). Campos did not file his complaint until July 5, 2012, even though he claims to have experienced discrete retaliatory acts as early as August 2008. While Campos describes a series of discrete retaliatory acts, spanning several years, only those acts occurring within the two-year statute of limitations are actionable. See Nat’l R.R. Passenger Corp. v. Morgan, 536 U.S. 101, 114 (2002). * The Honorable Donald W. Molloy, Senior District Judge for the U.S. District Court for the District of Montana, sitting by designation. 2 2. The district court did not err in holding that Campos failed to provide any evidence demonstrating a connection between his votes at the July 3, 2008 IPOA meeting and his performance evaluations. Huskey v. City of San Jose, 204 F.3d 893, 899-900 (9th Cir. 2000). Campos presented no evidence that Camacho was involved in or influenced his 2010 or 2011 performance evaluations. 3. With respect to overtime pay, the district court correctly held, based on Campos’s deposition testimony, that Camacho withdrew overtime from Campos only once, and that this overtime had been assigned to Campos in error. Thus, this withdrawal was not in retaliation for protected First Amendment activity because it was not “of a nature that would stifle someone from speaking out.” Blair v. Bethel Sch. Dist., 608 F.3d 540, 544 (9th Cir. 2010). Moreover, the undisputed evidence showed that Campos was consistently one of the highest earners of overtime wages. 4. Nor did Campos present evidence showing that he was “injured pursuant to an expressly adopted official policy, a long-standing practice or custom, or the decision of a final policymaker.” Ellins v. City of Sierra Madre, 710 F.3d 1049, 1066 (9th Cir. 2013) (internal quotation marks omitted). Campos provided no evidence of an official policy or custom of giving negative performance evaluations or withholding overtime shifts in retaliation. Nor has Campos 3 provided evidence that his asserted injury is attributable to a final policymaker. Id. at 1066-67. Thus, the City of Irwindale is not liable under a Monell theory of liability. See Monell v. Dep’t of Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658 (1978). Because Campos is not able to show that he was subjected to adverse employment action sufficient for recovery under § 1983, the district court properly granted summary judgment in favor of Camacho and the City of Irwindale. AFFIRMED. 4

    Newsletter

    Sign up to receive the Free Law Project newsletter with tips and announcements.

     Subscribe

    About

    Visual­izations

    FAQ

    Donate

    Citation Lookup

    Coverage

    APIs and Bulk Data

    Feeds & Podcasts 

    Jurisdictions

    Blog & Newsletter

    Contact

    Data Services

    Contribute

    Terms & Privacy

    Removal

    Vulnerability Policies

    CourtListener is sponsored by the non-profit Free Law Project.

  8. No I'm not going I would have had to go to jail that pig would have had to violate me all the way sorry there's just some things you got to make a stand on and giving up your rights under duress is a coward's way out they're your rights you should want to go to jail for them unlawful arrest kidnapping false imprisonment got you on every charge

Leave a Reply