studio city post office 1st amendment audit

studio city post office along with high desert community watch.

3950 Laurel Canyon Blvd, Studio City, CA 91604

If you’d like to donate to the cause and help keep me on the road:
https://www.paypal.me/johnnyfive00000

This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. we believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107

** (Disclaimer: This video content is intended for educational and informational purposes only) **

Author: rafael.nieves

ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2020 | HOSTING BY PHILLYFINEST369 SERVER STATS| & THE IDIOTS ROBOT AND CONTROL INC. |(RSS FEED MODULE)| ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS (phillyfinest369.com)

30 thoughts on “studio city post office 1st amendment audit

  1. The Department of Homeland Security's Federal Protection Services have said that it is perfectly legal to record the exterior of federal buildings and the interior where the public is commonly allowed to gather.

  2. FUCK high desert community watch👊👊👊😢😢High Desert Community Watch is a hypocrite and a sell-out tell him he got some blues. Coming out of the side of his mouth🐽🐽🐽😥

  3. Those who desire to perform their 'auditing' work in a professional manner, should first become familiar ('educate themselves') with the Law, where USPS Federal Regulations absolutely forbid any photography within USPS premises. This is more than obvious through reading Federal Title 39, USPS Poster 7,_ and the USPS Customer Relations Guidance — Photography (Sept 2017), the Postal Operations Manual (POM),_ and the USPS Postal Bulletin (2008) 22228.

    Federal Title 39
    https://mega.nz/#!TLZiALCJ!iM46pfUGDLNUuOr0H61h8LDFYiykNb3cGoDSAUdkBYE
    DHS Operational Readiness Order (2018) https://mega.nz/#!qfIRSCIR!UNfj8khxaQ2MLYJcQxtN8mnvtIK81tuWfW3iI7gsj2A
    USPS Customer Relations Guidance – Photography, 26 Sept, 2017
    https://mega.nz/#!fHJXQKTY!qJP-Ecud9UVI43pdEO4B9Uvwtt1MkmtYbXZHQYD_fMw
    USPS Postal Bulletin (2008) 22228
    https://mega.nz/#!SXI0yTpC!2f3Jh5pHVdPy-nADrJEzH2XKXfKCBWMFhr4J6NZ6wtE
    USPS Administrative Support Manual (ASM) vers.13 https://mega.nz/#!KSB0yaZT!y5GLMViQaHgn7LPZi54PkYvOw7pOW4kzyAJI-OzmxsQ

  4. Federal Government out sourcing a postal service, public functions and duties to a private body [US Postal Service] for a public purpose. Funded and approved by Congress in the amount of $18 billion by taxpayers last year. Federal property that's accessible by the general public except for secured restricted areas. For these reasons the decisions of US Postal Service that violate the constitutional rights of the public are amenable to judicial review. [Google Datafin Principle as a guide] DYOR

  5. 0:30 FAIL
    YOU ARE PLAYING WITH FIRE~!!
    I suggest you read my entire comment.

    This is NOT what FIRST AMENDMENT auditing should cover.
    STAY OUTSIDE ON THE SIDEWALK BESIDE THE STREET!!!!! …. please
    Please do not destroy privileges instead of protecting the right.

    What does POSTER 7 say?

    QUOTE
    Disorderly conduct, or conduct that creates loud and unusual noise, or which impedes entrance to or departure from Post Offices™ or otherwise obstructs the usual use of entrances, foyers, corridors, offices, elevators, stairways, and parking lots, or which otherwise tends to impede or disturb the public or employees in the performance of their duties, or which otherwise impedes or disturbs the general public in transacting business or obtaining the services provided on Postal Service property, is prohibited.
    END QUOTE

    5 years in federal prison is not the best way to learn proper auditing procedure.

    What?!

    The First Amendment is FORUM driven.
    With 'traditional public forums' being WHERE you have a RIGHT TO RECORD.
    And 'designated forums' being WHERE you have a RIGHT TO RECORD – BUT – under restrictions that you not disrupt the orderly business of the forum.
    And last, the 'nonpublic forum' WHERE you have NO RIGHT to RECORD
    but may be permitted to at the discretion of the owner.

    AUDITORS should ONLY be testing in 'traditional pubic forums'
    or designated forums that allow public input.
    THOSE are the ONLY PLACES where you car Record AS A MATTER OF RIGHT.
    Inside Police stations, courtrooms, etc. is by PRIVILEGE. And when you abuse privilege, it is usually taken away.

    First Amendment activity (like taking pictures) in public is strongly protected in traditional public forums and designated forums.

    "traditional public forums" include things like public parks, streets, and sidewalks ALONG SIDE THE STREETS, etc.

    "designated forums" include things like school board meetings where public input is invited as part of the meeting.

    Everything is nonpublic forum and often(but not everywhere) including court rooms, courthouses, PARKING LOTS and lobbies of agencies, etc. and that can also include dedicated sidewalks between the street and the building.

    There only has to be a rational basis to restrict filming in nonpublic forums.

    All the agency has to do is enact a "NO RECORDING DEVICES ALLOWED" policy and put up signage posted on the doors or between the street and the buildings — AND WHEN THEY DO — the public's PRIVILEGE to film FROM those areas will likely be GONE forever.

    Please QUIT encouraging destruction of my privileges.
    I support doing proper First Amendment audits, but this is not it.

  6. You have begun saying and/or implying that it is Trump supporters that don't like you filming.

    I would suggest that it is the opposite in fact. After all you are in Dimocrat Central

    Or they just may be ignorant of the law.

Leave a Reply