Rape survivor speaks on tanning salon owner’s criminal charges (Pt. 2)

Rape survivor speaks on tanning salon owner’s criminal charges (Pt. 2)

Was a serial rapist let go with just a slap on the wrist? That’s what one of his alleged victims is claiming in an all-new interview with Elizabeth Smart.

Full story: http://crimewatchdaily.com/2016/09/16/rape-survivor-speaks-on-tanning-salon-owners-criminal-charges/

source

Share this post

21 thoughts on “Rape survivor speaks on tanning salon owner’s criminal charges (Pt. 2)

  1. who else thought it was hilarious when the camera people were chasing him and he was running across the street and he dropped his stuff, like how do do you think those women felt when you were invading their bodies and taking some thing away from them, Felt like an invasion didn’t it

  2. I love seeing Elizabeth help and talk to these woman I'm outraged he didn't go to jail and that she was asked why didn't you do this or that it makes me very angry and I also don't think there should be a statute of limitations for rape I think that's stupid

  3. No, there shouldn't be a statute of limitations…. NO MAN should force himself inside of a woman who is screaming NOOOO….. and expect that a time limit to be placed…. the person who did a crime (no matter what) should pay for what they did to someone.

  4. I’m so glad they did this story on him: plaster his name and face everywhere so women know what kind of a monster he is! What a pathetic excuse of a man. I hope cops do their job and ensure the prosecution doesn’t fail the other four women as they did for this woman.

  5. load of BS. this fugly chick got drunk, got played, felt guilty and now wants attention. end of story. the tanning salon casanova probably banged a lot of his customers in that same spot.. it might make him a douchebag but doesn't make him a rapist. ELizabeth, YOU are a survivor – you shouldn't let drama-queens like this compare their nonsense to you and the other true sexual assault victims out there.

  6. I don't have Facebook but I can still give a resounding NO STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS. PERIOD. Idk what is wrong with this country. We are just as bad in our own right as all the other places we criticize. The government removed the Statute of Limitations on monies THEY incorrectly gave to low income people on food stamps. So WHY should there be one on violent crimes against anyone for anything? We make less and less sense every year. And these lawyers who defend people they KNOW or SUSPECT are guilty make me want to spew vomitus all over their briefcases. Seriously how do they live with thenselves getting a child molestor or sometimes MURDERER or a rapist or murderer off? I don't buy that crap they spout about fair trials and having to defend them to the best of their ability. Bullshit! They didn't give their VICTIMS any rights. I think the word is "recuse" or maybe that is just for judges. But the meaning is clear. I know I am not an attorney. But if I was and I knew the client was guilty? I would "recuse" or EXCUSE myself and get the F on the right damn side. Ah. Sorry. This crap. And elections and the crap at the Olympics turns my stomach.

  7. I am SO glad to see Elizabeth doing this! Congrats to her and her phenominal strength AND to you guys for choosing her! Like you said "who would know better?". This is another horrible situation but you will get this guy! And you will keep getting them. Our government needs to WAKEUP and put the RIGHT people in jail and freaking KEEP them there! TY

Comments are closed.