Get The Civilian Rights Handguide here: https://a.co/d/aDvE0xL
Submit your video here: https://forms.gle/FyrRquHvYtgjUDAw7
Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit
Sponsorship inquiries: au***@****fy.com
Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.
DISCLAIMER
This video is for educational and informational purposes only. Nothing in this video should be construed as legal advice. I am not an attorney, and the content of this video does not create an attorney-client relationship. All legal commentary is based on publicly available information and is presented for general analysis, not personal guidance. Viewers should consult a licensed attorney for advice specific to their legal situation. The views expressed are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of any individuals or institutions shown. This video is not intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer, and does not promote unlawful behavior. It is created solely to inform the public about constitutional rights, law enforcement practices, and police accountability.
Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction.
FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.
Sources:
Article-
http://bit.ly/40a1Wep
Kentucky v. King- https://bit.ly/2MEM3d9
Caniglia v. Strom- https://bit.ly/3jhHtOA
Muehler v. Mena- https://bit.ly/4nKJbs4
Florida v. J.L- https://bit.ly/3bUPKaO
Hope you're having a great day! Shout out to James Freeman for helping make this episode possible!
James Freeman's channel: https://www.youtube.com/@JamesFreeman1
James Freeman's coverage: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBvsuV1W1jU
This bullshit needs to be handled at the pig on the ground level. End their qualified immunity and sue everyone involved.
Next time Mr Akin needs to have a better door and a castle doctrine to properly protect their home against a tyrannical government…
Like W-H-I-T-E-S always say.He should have COMPLIED!!!!
They didn’t respect the tyrants’ lack of authority
I used to support the police.
Great police work!
We need to remember, police officers have a higher rate of domestic violence. The neighbor did hear hollering, the homeowner admitted to hollering. The homeowner knows police policies, so he should’ve been happy to open the door. I kind of think the old boy was up to no good . His wife behaves as a very docile individual . Almost to the point I might say obeying him. I don’t feel sorry for the ex cop. How many people did this ex cop do this to other people if not worse.
Welcome to communist America, brought to you by revenue generation because rich people don't pay taxes and the prison for profit industry. right wing politicians are always screaming about communism and here you have it right here and both parties refuse to do anything about it
Back in the day it was mind your own business. If a wife gets killed by domestic violence no big deal. She made her bed and laid in it.
When will the folks making these false claims be held accountable?
If 1 phone call justified them being there why didn't the 2nd phone call with the actual occupant of the home justify them leaving? Why is one phone call deemed more believable than the other
fucking shocker, it's Arizona again! Arizona! This state cannot understand the constitution!
Police: We're here to help!
Civilian: I don't need help.
Police: And I took that personally.
It's funny listening to these jackboots trying to copsplain to another old cop.
She may have been under duress and threatened by his physical proximity which is why the cops want to separate them for questioning. Cops didn't check on domestic violence like this until the 80s because they got sued due to victims being killed and the general public wanted increased oversight of domestic violence incidents.
Old man is still a copsucker after all that.
Oh good I’m glad he filed suit
Trying to protect the woman, she says she's fine husband is an ex cop, they ram the door hurting her.
All ego……nothing more, nothing less. They KNEW she was fine but they couldn't simply allow a citizen to disobey their UNLAWFUL order. How dare he!
Karens will ruin this world! Cops are so stupid they fall for it. Don't call these ego driven asshole sir! They are far from deserving such respect.
Nice of them to clearly admit that this procedure is their standard pattern and practice. That makes it impossible for the department to claim that these are 'just a few bad apples'.