Why Wasn’t Alex Murdaugh Covered in Blood After Allegedly Killing Wife and Son?

Why Wasn’t Alex Murdaugh Covered in Blood After Allegedly Killing Wife and Son?

Trial watchers asked why accused killer Alex Murdaugh wasn’t covered in blood when police arrived at his South Carolina home after he reported that he found his wife and son dead. “If he really did this there would be blood spattered onto his face and his arms,” litigator Richard Schoenstein explained on the Law&Crime Network. “He wouldn’t just have to change, he would have to clean up.”

#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughMurders #LawAndCrime

STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on YouTubeTV: https://bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime’s Daily Newsletter: https://bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3td2Iqo

LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lawandcrime/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/LawCrimeNetwork
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/lawandcrime
Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@lawandcrime

LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: https://lawandcrime.com/podcasts/

SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK YOUTUBE CHANNELS:
Main Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCz8K1occVvDTYDfFo7N5EZw
Law&Crime Shorts: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVXOqoOCYbi-iXChKAl6DTQ
Channel B: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXCLaaClAWQiTkl3pw9ZdLw
Channel C: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMV3pzWIhJGLYzoHyxBjjNw

source

Share this post

49 thoughts on “Why Wasn’t Alex Murdaugh Covered in Blood After Allegedly Killing Wife and Son?

  1. There’s simply not enough evidence in this case! Dude is innocent until PROVEN guilty, the “evidence” in this trial is lacking to the point of insufficiency

  2. Whats wrong with some of these questions?? Does his mom call him? Seriously people! She doesn't even know she's his mom!! Alzheimer's! And when he visits her what kind of alibi would his mom be with Alzheimer's? She had a care giver that testified on the stand what time and how long he was there! She was great by the way!!

  3. I think AM either was completely covered with rain coat/ tarp and then destroyed it or he helped get it rid of stuff. And that's why there's all this evidence with holes. Where was Eddie/Curtis during this….?

  4. Some think he removed ALL HIS CLOTHES “before” shooting Maggie and Paul. It was pre meditated. He had a change of clothes with him to slip on AFTER he hosed off down at the dog area. Then he dumped/buried everything thereafter.

  5. I have just now started watching and learning about this case. So I don't know all of the evidence yet. One thing sticks out to me. The testimony of the sister in-law revealed that he said he will clear his sons name. We all thought he ment his murdered son, because of the boat crash. The older son doesn't look upset, though. Which son was he really talking about?

  6. Why?
    That’s what we all ask and what we don’t understand. I understand this man is a selfish monster in many ways … he totally showed the world how greedy and selfish he is with no concern for anyone else’s money or how much they loved him … he wasn’t able to love his friends back, no loyalty, no guilt until the end, until the walls came crashing in around him …he admitted he had stolen from those who intrusted their future with him , he owned that but what else can a man with no conscience be guilty of … that’s the life or death question.

  7. What are your thoughts as to Murdaugh wearing two sets of clothes June7th 2021? At 7:55 pm Dress shirt/khakis and just over an hour later tshirt/shorts as confirmed by the Caregiver at his Mothers. Yet there is all the talk of why he was so "clean" as if that is a surprise, he changed his clothing! Why has the prosecution never addressed this key fact and why was he not required to produce those articles of clothing so that they could be tested???? It seems like the trial is fixed and he has a strangle hold on the law down there.

  8. If you are familiar with hunting, you know you could shoot something without getting blood on yourself or your clothes. It's done all the time.

  9. He had plenty of time to clean up nd rid of the bloody clothes. He even had time to change his clothes . He haunted his wife down like a wild animal , he specifically used that gun to shoot hogs, probably referring to his wife like a wild animal/ hog , nd shot his son .

  10. Because he had 4 bathrooms and they had one slow looking woman “check” the WHOLE HOUSE with 20 visitors contaminating the crime scene. Did she look for a WET bathroom? Never mind visible blood anywhere in a Lawers house, who has dealt with thousands of murders? Come on 🙄 promoted? She should have been FIRED!

  11. I also think it's strange he didn't have any blood on his clothes 😕. He said he turred Paul and touched the body's. He should actually should of had blood on him, all over if he touched his son the way he said.

  12. 7:56pm you clearly see in the tree video of Alex wearing totally different clothes vs 2 hours later when he's talking to the police right after the murders. Do normal people change clothes at 8pm at night? Police did drop the ball not collecting those clothes.

  13. I thought there's been talk that they found a raincoat with gun residue on it. If he was wearing a raincoat when he shot them it would have protected his clothes and body from any blood splatter.

  14. Um isn't it obvious? Because he had more than plenty of time to shower, change and dump the clothes on the way to his Moms house. How are so many oblivious to this fact and asking why he wasn't. It's obvious why.

  15. Alex was gone for hours wasn’t he?? Maybe he showered, quickly changed, & threw his bloody clothes away?? 🤷🏽‍♀️

  16. If he cleaned up somehow then what about the gunshot residue. How do u explain that being on him. Could he be innocent and just has residue on him from target shooting earlier that day

  17. They had to have had a bathroom shower on the property. Old Alex was getting sued over Paul, kid from what we have heard was costing a person that loved money as much as he stole, It I think the emotion was, man should have waited could have stole some more money. You think about it Paul looked like Maggie she was at the place at the wrong time, he anger got the best of him.

Comments are closed.