Mark Jensen was charged in 2002 for the 1998 death of his wife Julie Jensen and convicted in 2008. Prosecutors say he poisoned his wife with antifreeze and then smothered her with a pillow when she wasn’t dying fast enough. In 2013 a federal judge overturned that life sentence, arguing a letter Julie had written before her death shouldn’t have been admitted as evidence. In that letter, Julie wrote that she was afraid her husband would try and kill her. Jensen will now face trial for a second time in January 2023.
Reminder: The defendant, Mark Jensen, is wearing headphones because he’s hard of hearing. Thanks.
#AntifreezeMurder #MarkJensen #lawandcrime
STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on YouTubeTV: https://bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime’s Daily Newsletter: https://bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3td2Iqo
LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lawandcrime/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/LawCrimeNetwork
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/lawandcrime
Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@lawandcrime
LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: https://lawandcrime.com/podcasts/
SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK YOUTUBE CHANNELS:
Main Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCz8K1occVvDTYDfFo7N5EZw
Law&Crime Shorts: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVXOqoOCYbi-iXChKAl6DTQ
Channel B: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXCLaaClAWQiTkl3pw9ZdLw
Channel C: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMV3pzWIhJGLYzoHyxBjjNw
His searches he did has done him in. Guilty! Also I think mark may have been into men.
So the defence is suggesting breaks now for the prosecution case. Well I think she can figure that out for herself, thank you very much and the judge seems to agree with me. Getting more and more annoyed with this pair of defence ladies.
This evidence is soo damning. He himself stated she couldn’t get out of bed. So who else would have researched all of this right before she died?? Just give it up already.
The testimony and explanations of the IT dude, are making me suspect this entire trial. Bring qualified people who give true information. This is a scandel in motion.
We don't download the internet.
What a crack of nosense.
I keep thinking about the two sons and what they went through back when they were both little and this happened. They loved their mom so very much and needed her. How sad and heartbroken they must have been. Then dad brings in his sleaze-bag girlfriend. That must have been unbearable for them, but it gets worse. The creepy lurch-face dad marries the sleaze and then they have a baby. Then they get divorced. Too much. Those poor kids just wanted to stay home with her that day. 💔
At 7:54:18 there are other programs installed that show the family uses this computer including Reading Blaster-a kids’ learning game and Greetings Workshop, which makes Hallmark type greeting cards. Julie was the “crafty†one, I’d imagine she was more likely to use that than Mark.
The most 'BORING' trial I have ever watched. No wonder the judge went to sleep yesterday.
saying that the harassing postcard they tested for handwriting didn't match his must mean someone else sent it. i hear all this guilty stuff in chat but are people listening to this trial. every witness the prosecution puts on gets debunked.
He doesn't look happy his buddy has swapped seats,take it he doesn't like him,saying that neither did Darrell Brooks,he fired him and went on his own.
Interesting that now people get injected with botulism for fun
"So, how would you access the internet BACK in 1998…???"
The young lady makes it sound as if she's referring to the age of the Flintstones…😂
is anyone elses audio super choppy? Or do I have an issue with my laptop haha
Ok, hear me out…..first, I DO think he’s guilty. I think he is a strange, strange man. A very creepy man. BUT, trying to look at this from a non biased place, I’m not sure that any of this evidence is REALLY overwhelmingly convincing. I mean there’s common sense, but beyond a reasonable doubt….I’m just not sure. It’s not like they have his fingerprints on the antifreeze container. It’s all very circumstantial. Again, I think he’s guilty just from a gut feeling. But I’m not sure that is enough.
This judge is a TRIP…He’s the type that believes, “Do as I say, not as I do cause, I’M THE JUDGE AND, WHAT I SAY..GOES, DAMMIT!â€
Did anyone catch how the boys got to school the morning Julie died? I heard in Marks interview that he said she got the children dressed every morning.
I do not believe that mark Jensen is guilty I think he was falsely accused a lot of information was never even brought in to this case Unfortunately many years ago we spent time together in a cell All the way to where he is today Somebody needs to really investigate this on his behalf
The more questions and “testimony†the defense makes, the guiltier he looks
Watching Day 6. The defense is so put out by the investigating detective. Their facial expressions are uncalled for and unprofessional. The attorney with Jensen is still making goo-goo eyes at the defendant. He is doing it back. Unprofessional and disgusting.
You look nervous Mr Jenson
Not all heroes wear capes.
I've never seen a judge so withdrawn from a case. So much so he looks for every excuse to adjourn early. Wild
'Fry this maggot and get it over with.' – Arthur Spooner
The defense does more damage to him than the prosecution sometimes
How is the defense helping him?? I’m at a loss
Deportation government requirements but not opitions. notes ILR 📠SWITCHING TO change undapants visa application and have to defend life here and after ….(mcc).go to somelse door with that body of histroy ….wish to be trouble to free to see world 🌎
When did he try to get her to drink the glass of wine? Had she taken Paxil or ambien at the time? Could mess her up
I don’t believe she was on the Paxil or ambien for very many days before she died. Why was she taking ambien more than once a day? Still it was only a short period of time and Mark was feeding her these pills night and day
I am pleasantly surprised with how human this judge is. I don’t know if this is correct / common practice but I think it is wise to be cognizant of the jury’s ability to absorb the details being presented.
So, he researches symptoms instead of calling 911? Guilty, no doubt.
I haven’t heard if they found any trace of anti freeze in the house, but I don’t think the monster would have left any evidence around. He had too much time to clean up ☹ï¸