LAPD Cops Violate Rights of Photographer – Complaint Filed

LAPD Cops Violate Rights of Photographer – Complaint Filed

** (Disclaimer: This video content is intended for educational and informational purposes only) **

Author: phillyfinest369

ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2020 | HOSTING BY PHILLYFINEST369 SERVER STATS| & THE IDIOTS ROBOT AND CONTROL INC. |(RSS FEED MODULE)| ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS (phillyfinest369.com)

28 thoughts on “LAPD Cops Violate Rights of Photographer – Complaint Filed

  1. You let that supervisor off easy with that sliding scale crap onus!! Come on man please nut up and give back the crap that they throw at you 24/7. Its hard to see you get destroyed every video and it seems all you do is go write a check on their chalkboard and then the same stuff happens again!.

  2. That cop is dead wrong!!! What he is saying is, in legal terms, arbitrary and capricious. Capricious means to be subject to whim; impulsive and unpredictable. Arbitrary means based on random choice or personal whim, rather than any reason or system. If they need to protect his personal info, they must provide that protection by bringing him to a secure location, ie. In their car.

  3. No. Just because the arestee doesn’t want to be filmed doesn’t mean the cops can restrict the right of the photographer. If a murder suspect doesn’t want to do the perp walk will the cops stop the TV cameras ?? No and it’s the exact same thing.

  4. You need to make it clear that brights lights are also a action of assault, it hurts, its damages the retina's. And they used it against a law abiding citizen. That tactic is only used in tactical situations to disorient and obstruct criminals. Its a violation against the code of conduct to preform it on citizens.

Leave a Reply