Dashcam: Man awarded $100K In Police Excessive Force Lawsuit

** (Disclaimer: This video content is intended for educational and informational purposes only) **
The city of Tukwila has agreed to pay $100,000 to settle a civil-rights lawsuit filed by a man who was bitten by a police dog, repeatedly punched and tased during a 2014 arrest after officers found a man yelling and dancing in a freight yard. The city has also agreed to pay Linson Tara’s attorney fees in an amount to be determined later by U.S. District Judge John Coughenour.

The lawsuit, in addition to alleging that officers Brent Frank and Mike Boehmer used excessive force, challenged the constitutionality of the city’s de-facto policy of allowing police dogs to bite suspects as a “pain compliance” technique. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has held that the use of a K-9 bite is “the most severe force authorized short of deadly force.” Acting Deputy Chief Rick Mitchell declined to comment on the settlement when reached by phone on Friday.

The department’s attorney, Andrew Cooley, described the arrest as a “tense and rapidly evolving event, where the silent video captures only part of what happened.” Officers Frank and Boehmer responded the evening of Aug. 22, 2014, to a report of a man in the Tukwila UPS freight yard, “walking around, yelling and dancing,” according to a complaint filed in federal court.

They arrived to find Tara, who did not work there, being confronted by a number of employees. Police-dashcam video shows him standing with one hand on hip and the other held up, palm open. Frank, the K-9 officer whose dog, Ace, can be heard barking in the background, approaches Tara and tries to lead him toward the police cruiser. Boehmer approaches and Tara can be seen apparently trying to twist away from Frank’s grasp.

Frank then grabs him around the neck and forces him “over backward onto the hood of his patrol car,” according to the lawsuit. Boehmer is seen attempting to remove his Taser from his utility belt while Frank lifts Tara and slams him to the pavement. Frank is seen punching Tara in the face and head a half-dozen times. Boehmer, in the meantime, fires the Taser’s darts into Tara’s stomach from close range, and applies the weapon in contact stun-drive mode on Tara’s thigh.

Tara was rolled over, and the police dog is released remotely from its cage. Ace, a German or Malinois shepherd, is seen biting Tara in the buttocks and legs. Meantime, a third officer, identified in the lawsuit as Don Ames, arrives and places his knee on Tara’s head and handcuffs him. Afterward, the dog is pulled off the prone man and returned to his cage. Ames was not named as a defendant in the lawsuit. Ames rolls Tara over and looks at his face.

“On the video, it appears that Mr. Tara is unconscious,” the lawsuit says.

Tara was transported to a hospital, where he was treated for injuries that included dog bites. He was booked into jail and charged with three counts of fourth-degree assault. Those charges were later dismissed. According to the lawsuit, Frank wrote in his report that he deployed the dog “to assist in providing pain compliance” to subdue Tara. The lawsuit states that the department found the officers’ use of force, including the deployment of the police dog, to be within policy.

Tara’s attorney, Joseph R. Shaeffer, alleged that was an unconstitutional use of force and sought an injunction to stop the department from using dogs for that purpose. Some other departments limit the deployment of police dogs, recognizing the courts findings that dog bites are among the most severe uses of force. The canine policy of the Seattle Police Department, for example, states that dog handlers “will only allow their canines to physically engage or bite a suspect if there is a reasonable belief, or if it is known, that the suspect is armed with a weapon … capable of producing death or significant physical injury or otherwise poses an imminent threat of death or serious physical injury to the handler or others, or is engaged in active aggression or escaping.”

Donate to PoliceActivity: https://www.patreon.com/PoliceActivity
Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PoliceActivity
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Police_Activity

** (Disclaimer: This video content is intended for educational and informational purposes only) **

Author: rafael.nieves


39 thoughts on “Dashcam: Man awarded $100K In Police Excessive Force Lawsuit

  1. Officer 1: "Hey Mike? Do you remember which way the human arm bends? Because I can't seem to get this guy's arm behind his back."
    Officer 2: "No man, I skipped that part of training. Let's just beat the shit out of him."

  2. They must of ate their donuts n coffee n finally answers the call cause they got alot of energy it looks the cops trying to out do one another of who is stronger this is sick

  3. They already had him why bring the dog out 🧐 it’s to bad that there are some bad apples in the police force 😞 because there are good cops out there

  4. Good job officers I would punch the dude too All of you BLM activists on here are a bunch of police haters and terrorist Seriously your crybaby comments are ridiculous I’m surprised you little sissies haven’t accuse the police of being racist yet Gang members who are causing problems belong in jail

  5. There is a camera on the dash. Did they think that they're going to have an explanation for this? Poor guy not even resisting more than a second.

  6. Yeah, it's excessive but holy damn the guy was resisting like crazy. All the way to the cuffing. That fat cop could barely get the arms down.

  7. using the dogs in this manner never improves the situation. You cannot have a dog eating someone's arm and expect them to actually stay calm and still and put their hands behind their back.

  8. I really think dogs should only be used to stop a fleeing suspect, and then taken off once suspect is in cuffs. Could any cops or knowledgeable persons weigh in on this?

  9. How are you not supposed to fight back while being attacked and they are trying to kill you? These cops should be six feet under!!!

  10. 100k for that? That wasnt even that excessive. Maybe a little over done. But there are REAL cases of excessive force that go unnoticed and no one gets paid. But this?

Comments are closed.