Dallas PD learns about TURNER Vs DRIVER w/The Battousai

Dallas PD officer Pham plays it up for the cameras. He says a bunch of the typical cop one liners and some other blah blah blah-
but gets a lesson on TURNER Vs DRIVER from Mr. Turner himself….Please thumbs up, share and subscribe

The Battousai https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdiRpq3iPQqlicPX38G5AbQ

Skirts on the Beat with LaurasharkCW & Ida Foxy queen (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCxwr76XajtWE7WZarFawaUA), the first and only female cop watch team

** (Disclaimer: This video content is intended for educational and informational purposes only) **

Author: rafael.nieves

ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2020 | HOSTING BY PHILLYFINEST369 SERVER STATS| & THE IDIOTS ROBOT AND CONTROL INC. |(RSS FEED MODULE)| ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS (phillyfinest369.com)

42 thoughts on “Dallas PD learns about TURNER Vs DRIVER w/The Battousai

  1. PROTECT AND SERVE?? BULLSHIT!! arrogant and psychotic! THEY ARE NOT YOUR FRIENDS!
    ""BEFORE TRAINING IN HOW TO SHOOT SOMEONE THEY SHOULD BE TAUGHT THE BILL OF RIGHTS AND THE CONSTITUTION!"" THEY TAKE AN OATH AND THEN DONT KNOW IT?
    NEVER EVER GIVE UP YOUR GUNS! YOUR GOING TO NEED THEM!
    COPS AND FBI ARE DIFFERENT WHEN THEY PUT ON THEIR BADGE AND GUNS–THEIR PERSONALITIES CHANGE!
    WHERE DO THEY FIND THESE FUKN PEOPLE? WE NEED AN INDEPENDENT CITIZENS GROUP TO INVESTIGATE THESE FUKN PEOPLE!! TAKE THEIR GUNS AWAY AND THEIR "K-9 DOGS" (and tazers, pepper spray) THEY HAVE NO CHOICE BUT TO TREAT CITIZENS WITH RESPECT!! FIRST YOU GET A LECTURE FROM THE COPS!!
    JUST LIKE A HUNGRY DOG AT SOME RABBIT HOLE WAITING YOU TO MAKE A MISTAKE!! THE BIGGEST OUTLAWS ARE THE POLICE!! WE NEED CIVILIAN CONTROL OF POLICE, CIVILIANS RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR OWN COMMUNITIES!!

  2. Except that Turner v. Driver isn’t precedent for the conduct of Turner’s recording the routine activities of a police station. This is clearly true because the 5th Circuit used its discretion to bypass the first prong of the Saucier v Katz/Pearson v. Callahan procedure. The first prong is the so called “constitutional” question. The second prong is the “qualified immunity” question.
    Whenever a court bypasses the constitutional question (also known as: the merits, the facts, etc.) the conduct cannot be used to set precedent. This is one of many arguments against qualified immunity by its opponents. That because courts can, since Pearson Callahan (Supreme Court 2009), avoid judging the merits, then precedent can’t be established.

    {When a defendant raises a qualified immunity defense, the plaintiff has the burden of demonstrating the inapplicability of that defense.[14] To meet this burden, the plaintiff must show "(1) that the official violated a statutory or constitutional right, and (2) that the right was `clearly established' at the time of the challenged conduct."[15] Like the district court, we have the discretion to decide which prong of the qualified immunity analysis to address first.[16]}

    —Turner v. Driver, 5th Circuit Court Of Appeals 2017.

    {A. First Amendment

    The district court concluded that the defendants were entitled to qualified immunity on Turner's First Amendment claim because he failed to demonstrate that the defendants' actions violated a clearly established right or that their actions were objectively unreasonable. In particular, the district court ruled that a First Amendment right to video record police activity was not clearly established. The district court's analysis rested on the second, "clearly established," prong, so we begin there.}

    —Turner v. Driver

  3. The cop said he was, " Making sure you weren't doing anything, (SUPERFICIAL)". Superficial as in ( SUSPICIOUS) He switched the words up to make himself sound less intrusive. I guess if he is checking on something SUPERFICIAL instead of SUSPICIOUS then he isn't violating your righta by stopping and questioning you…. Amazing how they are rewording their approaches as if the public will have to then comply because he is using less offensive phrases.

  4. Hey Battousai…I've said this before but THANKS MAN to you and your lawyer for taking your case all the way to the 5th Circuit Court…Turner V Driver made it legal and a right for citizens of the 5th to video or photograph 5th Circuit LEO'S in the course of their duties…Great BIG KUDOS!!! You are a Legend….Stay Safe!

Leave a Reply