Alex Murdaugh’s Testimony Shakes Up Family Murders Trial as Defense Rests Their Case

Alex Murdaugh’s Testimony Shakes Up Family Murders Trial as Defense Rests Their Case

The last witness Alex Murdaugh’s defense team called to the stand was the disgraced lawyer himself, who testified about various allegations made against him in previous weeks of his family murders trial. Murdaugh confessed he stole money from numerous victims and lied to dozens of people who trusted him the most. The disbarred South Carolina attorney told to jury his timeline from the night his wife and son were murdered, doubling down on his innocence in the killings. The Law&Crime Daily team has the latest on this high-profile trial.

L&C Daily Hosted By:
Brian Buckmire: https://twitter.com/TheBuckEsq
Terri Austin: https://twitter.com/Terridaustin
Jesse Weber: https://twitter.com/jessecordweber

Producers:
Savannah Williamson
Heather Berzak: https://twitter.com/HeatherBerzakTV

#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughMurders #LawAndCrime

STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on YouTubeTV: https://bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime’s Daily Newsletter: https://bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3td2Iqo

LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lawandcrime/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/LawCrimeNetwork
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/lawandcrime
Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@lawandcrime

LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: https://lawandcrime.com/podcasts/

SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK YOUTUBE CHANNELS:
Main Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCz8K1occVvDTYDfFo7N5EZw
Law&Crime Shorts: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVXOqoOCYbi-iXChKAl6DTQ
Channel B: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXCLaaClAWQiTkl3pw9ZdLw
Channel C: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMV3pzWIhJGLYzoHyxBjjNw

source

Share this post

41 thoughts on “Alex Murdaugh’s Testimony Shakes Up Family Murders Trial as Defense Rests Their Case

  1. Does anyone else think it’s odd that the murdaughs didn’t have any cameras anywhere on that property?!? 🤔 strange to me 🤷🏼‍♀️

  2. He is criminal on the all levels he was running illegal business with selling illegal things and laundering money under the table his family was executed for exposing this family and for putting on jeopardy many people who was involved in it . Wouldn’t be surprise if he will «kill himself “

  3. I don't like to say it but i can't see a gilty,,, the police made so many mistake s if it was not for the son's phone this trial would not be happening,, he just needs one person just one seed in one of the jury and the police didn't do there job to be honest with the way the police acted it would be unsafe if he was sent to jail,, in a trail it's not what you know it's what you can prove and he knows this well

  4. Actually he lied earlier than the the car interview. When the police got at the compound, as soon as the police arrived he started talking about Pauls boat crime might have something to do with the murders and that he had been to his parents home.

  5. Once again, the spotlight, social and mainstream media and the attention of the World is on the Murderer, the prosecutor needs to be stern and upright, and bring the attention back to the innocent victims!, May Maggie and Paul Murdaugh R.I.P

  6. IN TODAY FEB 27 the SECOND FORENSIC EXPERT SAID THE PELLETS COULD HAVE EVEN HIT THE SHOOTER . THE CAREGIVER FOR AM FATHER SAID “ ALEXANDER MURDAUGH HAD A BRUISE ON HIS FOREHEAD *****IMPORTANT IMPORTANT COULD THE BRUISE BE CALLED BY A PELLET ??

  7. Interesting case. There is no direct evidence that he was the shooter. But there is direct evidence that he was at the scene at or around the time of the murders (Paul’s video). All the rest is circumstantial. But most evidence is circumstantial. Fingerprints are circumstantial, for example, as is DNA.

    There are three things, though, that could do him in. One, he’s a pathological liar, so whatever he says is suspect. Two, he lied about being at the scene just before the murders. There is no reason to do that unless he’s trying to create an alibi. Three, he tried to get his mother’s caregiver to lie about how long he was there. Again, trying to create an alibi.

    So, he had the guns, the scene was far from the house, making it less likely anyone would hear it, and he tried to create an alibi. The only thing lacking is a clear motive. Is it enough that his life as he knew it was over and his family would be ruined. He said his wife didn’t work, whatever money he did have would go to the victims of his financial crimes. Is wanting to save them from suffering that fate enough to compel him to kill them? But there’s the life insurance.

    He attempted to stage his own death so his surviving boy would get the money. Why not just keep everyone alive and let everyone share in the money? And why not kill the other boy?

    The last thing that seems odd is the fact that two guns were used. I’m pretty sure that a 12-gauge with 00 buck would do the job on unarmed and unsuspecting victims. So, either there were two shooters, or it was done to make it look like there were two shooters to deflect suspicion. He was, after all, a master of deception.

    He also tried to throw the police off by bringing up the threats the other boy received because of the boat accident.

    It all adds up to guilty.

Comments are closed.