Get The Civilian Rights Handguide here: https://a.co/d/aDvE0xL
Submit your video here: https://forms.gle/FyrRquHvYtgjUDAw7
Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit
Sponsorship inquiries: au***@****fy.com
Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.
DISCLAIMER
This video is for educational and informational purposes only. Nothing in this video should be construed as legal advice. I am not an attorney, and the content of this video does not create an attorney-client relationship. All legal commentary is based on publicly available information and is presented for general analysis, not personal guidance. Viewers should consult a licensed attorney for advice specific to their legal situation. The views expressed are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of any individuals or institutions shown. This video is not intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer, and does not promote unlawful behavior. It is created solely to inform the public about constitutional rights, law enforcement practices, and police accountability.
Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction.
FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.
Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bIFvFBRT4zg
GavelGazers Court Watch‘s channel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bIFvFBRT4zg
Kolender v. Lawson- https://bit.ly/3F5ep7j
Tex. Penal Code § 38.15- https://bit.ly/48ynDYx
Childers v. Iglesias- http://bit.ly/4eTxCuD
Tex. Penal Code § 38.03- http://bit.ly/4lx8z2L
Finley v. State- http://bit.ly/4kLXiKZ
Duncantell v. State- http://bit.ly/44DqOOk
Like this comment if you would subscribe to an "Audit the Court" channel that makes content that is exclusively like this. We'll do it if we know there's enough people interested in this type of content.
Where the fuck was Judge Fleischer A+?
"My name is Bennett and I ain't in it" are words we would all be wise to live by ðŸ™Â
I like this judge more and more.
Lets go get the effin' book. ABSOLUTELY.
Excellent public defender. That guy needs to be in prison. He’s clearly a career criminal.
Judge Fleischer is incredibly fair and honest. He actually cares about helping people and calling out things like police brutality and institutional racism. We need to clone this man.
I really enjoy your court video 🙂 Keep both coming
DAs trying to make "uncooperative" a crime?!?
Love this judge and defense attorney.
The prosecutors and LEO need to have the judge sanction them for misrepresenting the truth to the Court.
The prosecutors should be after justice and not a win.
What a waste of taxpayer money and time.
I have seen a few of there and this judge seem to be very far
Cops have to embellish everything or they wouldn’t have anything to do
Calling a pig a peace officer is a complete joke
If the last 2 minutes of this video doesn't show how prosecutors will twist words and situations to fit what they want, I don't know what will. The look on their face when the judge watched the video and said "come on" was the same look a child gives their parent when they get caught in a lie
For anyone interested Judge Fleischer has a YT channel. This guy is awesome!
They should have charged him with resisting.
Shouldn't they all have seen the body cam evidence before hand .
I'm sure it'd have saved time and money.
If only more Judges followed this man as a example of pure judicial unbiasedness. This man is a shining light of exemplary logic and rationale of what our court system should and deserve to be.
I do like judge Fleischer
Shame on thé prosecutors. Shame!
ARE YOU RUNNING OUT OF VIDEOS THIS ONE SEEMS LAZY
"However…"
We have a good judge here!
Just glad that despite this charge and statute being unconstitutional, guy will still be held for his warrants.
This judge is the best of the best !!! I love him he is fair he is human ! He isn’t better than us ! He shows all this ! Love this man ! You can tell the d,a is all about getting him locked up and bring up past yes he did bad ! But just cause of that don’t mean you can make stuff worse then it is ! Now she knows he have a point she has another lawyer with her 😂
Yeah seen this yesterday the judge dismissed the case.
It seems pretty clear to me that the law was written to affect THRID PARTIES that interfere with police duties.
They argued legal terms for an hour and then watch the body camera. Maybe watch the video first. I want that defense attorney on my side for sure.
This judge is taking a break from allowing his content on yt, not sure why. Nothing for the last several months.
I think I heard the prosecutor ask if they could refile under different charge…how many bite of the apple do they get?
What's a matter guys? You don't want to give a judge a grade? Hahaha
I wonder is why the prosecutor even cares about a bogus charge of interference when the defendant is already facing years in prison for more serious charges.
1) Not a fan of this series that much.
2) Would have really appreciated putting in the bodycam footage so we can see it or at least partner this episode with an analysis of the encounter almost Double-Feature style.
It's been eight months and this clip has made the rounds, and it always strikes me 1) how good faith the judge is and 2) how passionate the attorney is.
Resisting being kidnapped isn't a crime.
"Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor" is VERY basic and critical to our system. I'm sure it's against the law, but I guess that depends on who you are seeing as no charges were brought against those who did it.
Why did the judge take so long to watch the video😅 everything resisting
Embarrassing for the prosecutor to dig their heels into the ground on this charge. Literally laughed out of the courtroom
The prosecutors laughing at this lawyer trying to defend his client is beyond disgusting. And it shows you everything you need to know.
WTH is wrong with the prosecutor… she doesn’t benefit anything to act so arrogant! 😂😂😂
Judge Fleisher always gets an A+
Im confused as to why it took so long for him to watch video evidence, instead of going off written reports. Of course officers are gonna write it up in a matter that supports the charge.
Those prosecutors are SO slimy. Do smug and confident and all it took was a minute of the video for the judge to full on laugh at the absurdity of their claim. Imagine how many cases where the body cam footage was "lost" ended in these additional bogus charges.
Isn't it funny how an independent judge watching seconds of a video finds no probable cause and yet two prosecuting attorneys and all the police and all the other prosecutors officers didn't see it?
"when they were detaining him, he resisted arrest" Well that just doesnt make any gdamn sense
A cop should have to clearly say I'm placing you under arrest or I am detaining you..
Supreme Court has ruled that we have to verbalize invoking our rights. Such as needing a lawyer or wanting a lawyer. Fifth amendment. Yes it's absurd that you have to use your words to remain silent….
A cop is not required to infer something unless we say it.
Yes we are expected to infer it from a cop without them saying it
I watched fat electricians vid on HEB they own the land of every business around them if they were still in that shopping area HEB owns it and .1 mile is like 500 ft I'm sure HEB owns it
I'm not for the US (I'm from Europe) so if someone can explain I would appreciate. I understand the person was arrested under an incorrect cause as he was NOT resisting and the judge is fantastic to go to the bottom of the issue by accepting to watch the camera video. However the person has a warrant and he is carrying drugs. So how come the outcome is that this person goes free and the charge is not modified to what should be the correct arrest cause? Or they free him and the second after before he goes out, then they book him for the warrant. I understand he is incorrectly accused of something he has not done but it seems there are so many others things that makes him guilty. I'm scratching my head to understand the logic so if someone can explain your legal system. thanks!
Seems like an honorable reasonable judge. Something you can no longer count on in America with the many corrupt Trump appointed judges