This video is sponsored by SafetyVid.org which uses a network of 10,000 cameras to automatically capture video of highway crashes. Yes, you can get video of YOUR crash today at SafetyVid.org.
Please consider JOINING for $1 a month. It *really* helps us do original reporting like this.
THIS DISEASE HITS KIDS HARD – WE’LL MATCH YOUR DONATION :
Angelman Syndrome is a rare disease most commonly diagnosed in young children. Donate today and we’ll match it! — https://www.angelman.org
Send proof of donation to mn.safety.alerts@gmail.com
CONTACT US:
Complaints? Video submissions? Sponsorships? Collabs? Business inquires?
Email our board at mn.safety.alerts@gmail.com.
BE NICE:
The individuals presented in these videos may be suffering from the effects of alcohol, drug abuse, a mental health disorder or simply having a bad day. The videos should NOT be presumed to be representative of their general behavior. Everyone deserves to be treated with respect.
ABOUT MIDWEST SAFETY:
Midwest Safety works to promote transparency in government while providing educational, informative and local news coverage to empower the public with knowledge of the inner workings of the Criminal Justice System.
thief or no thief that dude dodged a bullet
No bail! 😂😂😂
Get out while yoy can bro! 😂
Imagine being so broke that you're stealing from a Family Dollar store.
literal apes are better behaved (and more intelligent) than this scholar
how can someone have a forehead that big but no knowledge in that head?🤔
Jails are full of people that “ haven’t done nothing.”
When they first chucked her in that car that was so satisfying 😂
His dog doesn't bite but his girlfriend does.
If you haven't done nothing then you have done something. "I haven't done nothing" is a double negative.
The whining like a child is insane.
I can't believe they had to drag her to and in the cat.
Privilage and Entitlement anyone?
Thank goodness for this girl and guy showing us the good and bad way to deal with a trespass. This is valuable data that can be used to point and laugh at many people.
To all the Future Criminals, Here is how to not admit to doing a Crime.
There are two possible variables, with two options to state.
There is Have done something, and there is Have Not done something. And the something could be a crime, like robbery, or it could be nothing, not doing a robbery. So that would look like Crime or No Crime.
So that means there are 4 options to say to the Police. You could say:
I have Done Crime. This is just admitting that you have done a crime. Well done for confessing.
I have Not Done Crime. This is lying, if you have done crime. But the Police don't know yet, that you have done crime.
I have Done No Crime. This is stating your innocence. This is best if you have done crime, but you believe it to not be crime.
I have Not Done No Crime. This mean that you have done crime. Well Done on admitting that you have done a crime.
This. This is the one that you all say. This is the one thing that you should not say. You should say, "I have Done No Crime". Or you should say "I have Not Done Crime".
But you should never say "I ain't done nothing". Because that means that you Did do something. And what did you do?? That's right. A Crime.
Unfortunately she probably cannot afford a good lawyer but if she could she probably has a good case. And there is no duty in most places to cooperate or identify for a criminal trespass warning. All it is is a notation by the police that this person has been given an official warning that they are no longer allowed in a certain place. That warning does not have to be issued from the police, the owner simply needs to make it known to the person directly that they are not allowed and that they are considered trespass. The police issuing the warning, in most cases because you have not committed any criminal offense you have no duty to identify yourself to them. You are not being detained on suspicion of anything because you must have noticed first that your trespassing in order to have violated the law for trespass. So you cannot create a scenario where you must identify in order to tell someone that they've been trespassed.
This would mean obstruction does not apply because the detention was illegal. When the detention is illegal everything that follows from it is also illegal. Unfortunately police like this just make the matters worse. They could have taken her picture put it in the system and noted that they verbally told her that she is trespassed they have body cams that support that if she does not wish to comply or listen to them because they don't have a legal reason to detain her that's up to her. Next time if she returns they now have all of the evidence that she was given proper notice.
“Not doing anything” is why you are under arrest. You were asked to leave and didn’t 😂
That's the problem – they do "nothing" when they needed to do "something"
Yeah she’s annoying but holy escalation for no reason just bc he was impatient???
Do I see a goose egg?
I wonder how many of these videos got the stupid american who view them side with the cops or the civilian. I wonder how many americans realize their country has become a police state. People from other countries watch these and realize it. Thank fuck for Canada.
Being trespassed while Tainted Love is playing on the background…, poetic justice indeed.
She should take some notes from the puppy, he was such a good boy
Oof that knot is serious 😂
" Let me go i want too run away! Let me me go i want too get away!"
If her parents gave her healthy discipline and took care of these tantrums when she was 3, she wouldn't be acting this absolutely insane way at 23. She would have understood authority, discipline and consequences, and it would have saved her a lot of pain.
Absolute waste of resources and unnecessary. these cops need fired and replaced. Should be zero spicks
these are the type of police officers that need their families to pay the price
I am so annoyed by these people asking "why?" then interrupting as soon as they get an answer
She just doesn't understand
Taze those nasty feet!😂
the absolute Peter Pan syndrome in some people I swear to god
DAMN. thats a nasty knot 🫢
Super chill doggo. Gorgeous too 💗
"I haven't done nothing!" … ugh.
8:31 the t.rex from Jurassic Park kinda kills me 😅😄😂.
This arrest wasn’t legal, the trespass wasn’t legal, and the officers badly overextended their authority. Chronologically, the whole thing falls apart the moment you actually apply trespass law and the Fourth Amendment instead of cop folklore.
The woman approached a Family Dollar and was told she could not enter the building. That is a denial of service, not a trespass notice. At no point was she told to leave the property, no one said “you are trespassed,” and no notice was given that her presence on the lot itself was forbidden. She then left anyway and went across the street, fully ending any possible trespass issue before police ever arrived. Trespass is about remaining after notice. Once she left, there was no crime, no ongoing violation, and nothing to enforce.
When police arrived, they didn’t witness any trespass, and they didn’t encounter her on the property in question.
They then went back to the store and essentially asked the employees whether they wanted her criminally trespassed. That alone shows this was not an active offense but a retroactive attempt to manufacture one.
Trespass warnings are forward looking. At most, police can say “you may not return.” They cannot detain someone off the property to process paperwork for a non crime that already ended.
When the officers approached her across the street and said “we just want to talk, you’re not in trouble,” that was a consensual encounter. She was legally allowed to walk away. Walking away from police during a consensual encounter is not obstruction, not resistance, and not suspicious by itself.
The moment the officers threatened arrest for continuing to walk away, they crossed a constitutional line.
They had no reasonable articulable suspicion of a crime. They explicitly admitted she didn’t steal anything.
Trespass was impossible because she wasn’t on the property.
Disorderly conduct was never articulated.
You cannot detain someone just to issue a trespass warning, and you certainly cannot force them to a patrol car to complete paperwork. Saying “you’re under detention” doesn’t make it lawful if there’s no legal basis for the detention.
An unlawful detention cannot be obstructed. Refusing to talk, refusing to walk to a squad car, refusing to sign paperwork, and refusing to provide ID during a non detention are all protected conduct.
Separating her from her dog escalated this into a physical seizure, which requires lawful detention authority they did not have.
The resistance and obstruction charges collapse because they are secondary charges that depend on a lawful detention or arrest. Here, there wasn’t one.
This is a textbook Fourth Amendment violation built on a misunderstanding of trespass law. The store denied entry, the woman left, the police arrived late, escalated a non issue, detained someone without legal cause, and then justified the arrest using the person’s refusal to cooperate with an unlawful detention.
That’s why cases like this routinely get dismissed when challenged, and why departments quietly rely on people not knowing the difference between denial of service, trespass notice, and actual criminal trespass.
The failure of this channel and it's viewers to notice these rights violations makes me think you're all bootlickers at worst… or at best ignorant of basic civil rights.
I hope none of you that responded positively ever get accepted into a law enforcement capacity. Shame on you all.
Please report police encounters without bias. The guy who speaks at the end of the Video has no idea what he's talking about. He insinuates the woman was arrested for "Not listening".
Deplorable and sickening op ed. Nobody should be arrested simply for "Not listening". Its not a crime to "Not listen".
Its the kind of thing you hear from toxic parents who abuse their authority over their children. "Don't talk back, listen to me or you're in time out"
As if the public is a bunch of children, and the only adults are law enforcement.
It's insulting to the average citizen.
Top 3 common phrases for these videos:
1) "I haven’t done nothing!"
2) "what did I do?"
3) "why am I being arrested"
“Don’t touch me please
I cannot stand the way you tease
I love you, though you hurt me so
Now, I’m gonna pack my things and go…”
The BS about being "pregnant" you can't tase me needs to stop. Tase their ass, since 99.999999% of them are lying. This one wouldn't be thrashing around in that squad car like that if she were really pregnant.
the entitlement to say a property owner's wish to trespass you is "BS" is evidence for SEVERE narcissism, mental derangement, delusion, and main character syndrome.
6:44. Headphones user beware
how is she pregnant? shes a child herself
she doesnt need a CTW and needs a EXORCIST
Pretty sad when the dog is more civilized than what was holding it.
That bump on her head took her from crying baby to Star Trek character real quick
Lmao the bump on her head 🤣 she fd around and found out lmaooo
Acting childish and not cooperating with Police is going to make you spend a longer jail sentence. I hope she's no longer pregnant, because she brought the miscarriage on herself due to her whiny behavior.