Former Police Officer Gets Interrogated, Waives His Rights

This low-quality video out of Washington (about which I am intentionally not providing much in the way of background information) demonstrates just how challenging it can be for some people to remember that when they are on the receiving side of an interrogation, the only intelligent move is to invoke your rights.

I want to take this opportunity to clarify some things as best I can (while noting that nothing I write here is legal advice):

Some find it strange, but in order to invoke your right to remain silent you MUST speak. Merely remaining silent or using your body language is insufficient. Not only that, but you must invoke your rights by speaking in a clear and unambiguous manner. Again: If you want your invocation to legally count you must state that you wish to remain silent verbally and unambiguously. The only alternative is that *you have waived your right to remain silent.*

Any of the following should suffice:

“I am invoking my Miranda Rights. I will not answer your questions and I want to speak with my attorney.”

“I refuse to answer questions and want to contact an attorney.”

You can even say, “I am invoking my right against self-incrimination.”

Now, you heard the officers in this video badgering their subject about how obvious it was that his silence implied his guilt. So why would you invoke your rights by explicitly referencing your right against self-incrimination? Isn’t that incriminating? No!

Realize that the only reason those officers were legally allowed to do what they did is because the subject in this video never actually invoked his rights until the very end of the video.

At which point – as you saw – the interview immediately ended. That was not a coincidence!

However someone asserts their right to remain silent, it must be remembered that they people are allowed to change their mind. How might that change be communicated? By speaking or answering questions! Therefore, if you ever invoke your right to remain silent it is incumbent upon you to show with your actions that you are in fact invoking your right. Be quiet. Your ambiguity can undermine even your explicit statements.

Don’t be the guy in this video. He may be innocent of all charges and he may be guilty, but speaking with the police did nothing to help his case.

In an upcoming video I will show you someone who tries to invoke his rights ambiguously – through his silence – and who would have been far better served by speaking the few words necessary to clearly invoke.

Finally, I would be remiss if I did not note that it can certainly be appropriate to speak with police officers — if you are the one who called them.

It may seem as though I am trying to protect criminals. Absolutely not! Police interrogations in the United States have a goal, and it’s not “finding out the truth.” That goal – the purpose of the Reid Technique – is obtaining confessions. From whomever is sitting in front of you.

Stay safe out there.

~~~

Real World Police is proud to be a Sunshine Supporter of the Washington Coalition for Open Government — working to educate, advocate, and litigate the public’s right to know. Want to know more about access to public records in Washington? Visit www.washingtoncog.org.

~~~

Do you have independently verifiable inside information on a story we are or should be covering? Email tips@realworldpolice.com. Your identity will not be revealed without your consent. Because we receive dozens of tips daily we cannot respond individually to every submission. If we need more information from you someone will be in touch.

Remember: we don’t publish footage that has already been published. Please don’t send links to news articles.

~~~

Follow us on Twitter @realworldpolice

~~~

Want to help make Real World Police happen and get rewarded for it? Become a supporter on Patreon today! Supporters get access to:

-Exclusive full-length Real World Police videos
-The Roadcam series
-Supporting documentation: police reports, court records, and other investigatory material
-Material from cases not shown on the main channel, like the arrest of Chris Hansen and the detention of T-Pain that time he accidentally tried to bring a gun through airport security
-Early access to some videos
-And more!

https://patreon.com/realworldpolice

Rather not?

That works too. There are more than 490 free videos to enjoy!

** (Disclaimer: This video content is intended for educational and informational purposes only) **

Author: rafael.nieves

ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2020 | HOSTING BY PHILLYFINEST369 SERVER STATS| & THE IDIOTS ROBOT AND CONTROL INC. |(RSS FEED MODULE)| ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS (phillyfinest369.com)

30 thoughts on “Former Police Officer Gets Interrogated, Waives His Rights

  1. Never speak so many great Americans have died or disabled so the rest of the American citizens can have there rights. USE THEM , these investigators are using text book to get this man to talk. DONT TALK

  2. It's a common misconception that invoking your right to remain silent "makes you look guilty." Investigators may want you to think that — they may even tell you that's the case. In fact, just the opposite is true. Guilty suspects are many times more likely to talk to the police than innocent ones.

    Also, your comments beneath the video about invoking your rights are spot on. As someone who was arrested half a dozen times in my teens and early 20s (mostly for felony drugs charges and once for manslaughter), I know first-hand how duplicitous the police can be in the interrogation room.

    I don't blame them for that — it's their job. And I certainly have no problem when guilty suspects hang themselves by talking to the police. But it's disturbing to think how many innocent people have also been locked away for years or decades all because they made a decision one day long ago to waive their rights.

  3. Man, these cops are going after him with the same old lies. "If you don't tell us everything, you're only hurting yourself!"
    And
    "When you say you're not talking about some things because it'll get you into trouble…"
    The officer suspect said I'm going to talk about some things and others I won't. He never said it'll incriminate or get him into trouble; but they slipped that in there to use against him later. Too bad for them that he corrected them and said, "I never said that!"
    NEVER GO INTO AN INTERROGATION ROOM (OR INTERVIEW ROOM, AS THEY PUT IT TO GET YOU TO AGREE TO GO IN) WITHOUT A LAWYER!
    EVERYTHING YOU SAY AND DO IN THERE, WILL BE USED AGAINST YOU?

  4. The funny thing is, if cops couldn’t get people in the box and get them to confess, they’d actually have to do some real work and gather some evidence. But alas, over 90% of people don’t lawyer up.

  5. Best advice , say "YouTube, this video's availability is a product of leaking evidence without cause which is a serious crime and your own license to operate will be under threat should you show it. Now get my fucking lawyer cos I'm not saying shit without them"

Leave a Reply