Don’t Consent to Search? That’s cool. “Here Doggy!”

I’m going to stay pretty silent on this one, as I am curious to hear y’alls thoughts on this stop – and particularly on the interactions that followed.

Enjoy,

~~~

/r/realworldpolice

@realworldpolice

~~~

Want to help make Real World Police happen and get rewarded for it? Become a Sergeant on Patreon today! Sergeants get access to:

-A growing library of more than sixty exclusive full-length Real World Police videos
-The Roadcam series
-Supporting documentation: police reports, court records, and other investigatory material
-Material from cases not shown on the main channel, like the arrest of Chris Hansen and the detention of T-Pain by TSA.
-Early access to some videos
-And more!

Get your fix today!

https://patreon.com/realworldpolice

Rather not?

No sweat! There are more than 700 free videos to enjoy ✌️

** (Disclaimer: This video content is intended for educational and informational purposes only) **

Author: rafael.nieves

ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2020 | HOSTING BY PHILLYFINEST369 SERVER STATS| & THE IDIOTS ROBOT AND CONTROL INC. |(RSS FEED MODULE)| ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS (phillyfinest369.com)

41 thoughts on “Don’t Consent to Search? That’s cool. “Here Doggy!”

  1. Cop: Ok if I search the car?
    Guy: Do you have probable cause?
    Cop: no that's why I want to search the car
    That's messed up. I thought you searched BECAUSE you have probable cause. I usually am on the cops side but this isnt right.

  2. It’s important to not consent because if the cops search it anyway an attorney can get anything illegal found thrown out. Furthermore, if the cops use a dog there are circumstances where a dog alerting to something can be challenged & evidence thrown out. It’s also important to ask the cop “Am I free to go?” By doing this you’re not consenting to being detained for an unreasonable amount of time which an attorney can also use to throw out evidence.

  3. As that pig searched high an low only threw all them Newport boxes only thing I kept hearing in the back of my mind was in my best ice cube voice "fuck the police coming straight from tha underground!"

  4. DAM!!! ALL UP HIS ASS AND HIS BUSINESS!

    Smh!

    People!
    don’t give Cops the satisfaction of going through your stuff! Keep your car clean and leave unnecessary stuff home.

    I feel so violated just by watching this!

  5. Lot of moving parts to Probable Cause and the best thing one can do is shut up the 5th amendment is for innocent men not people with something to hide Ohio v. Reiner SCOTUS!

    1. See Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 232 (1983).
    2. United States v. Humphries, 372 F.3d 653, 657 (4th Cir. 2004).
    3. Prosecutor's Manual for Arrest, Search and Seizure, § 6-6(b) (2004).
    4. See Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), at 648, 655.
    5. See Ariz. v. Evans, 514 U.S. 1 (1995).
    6. People v. Boyer, 305 Ill. App. 3d 374 (1999), at 379-80.
    7. See Gates, 462 U.S. at 238.
    8. Whiteley v. Warden, 401 U.S. 560, 564 (1971).
    9. Prosecutor's Manual for Arrest, Search and Seizure, § 3-2(c) (2004).
    10. See Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 171 (1978).
    11. See United States v. Mick, 263 F.3d 553, 566 (6th Cir. 2001).
    12. See United States v. Schaefer, 87 F.3d 562, 566 (1st Cir. 1996).
    13. See United States v. White, 356 F.3d 865 (8th Cir. 2004).
    14. See, e.g., United States v. Clark, 638 F.3d 89, 100–05 (2d Cir. 2011)

  6. This is simple harassment by police that don't understand we have a constitution. Pulling a guy over for no belt is ridiculous and bringing a dog after a refusal is an illegal search no matter what the lawyers say.

  7. All because this man asked why he has to get out of the car the cop just assumed there is drugs in his car. What’s the purpose of asking if it’s ok to search the car if they gonna do it anyway regardless if you say yes or no?? I don’t understand that at all..

Leave a Reply