Get The Civilian Rights Handguide here: https://a.co/d/aDvE0xL
Submit your video here: https://forms.gle/FyrRquHvYtgjUDAw7
Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw
Third channel: youtube.com/channel/UCmc4biDadYIwhBctWd1ESuA/
Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/252NA7Tu7PNiIypGkel5O3?si=bEeqVPirSJupYPuFD76IzQ
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit
Sponsorship inquiries: au***@*****ed.com
For collaborations: au**********@***il.com
Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.
DISCLAIMER
This video is for educational and informational purposes only. Nothing in this video should be construed as legal advice. I am not an attorney, and the content of this video does not create an attorney-client relationship. All legal commentary is based on publicly available information and is presented for general analysis, not personal guidance. Viewers should consult a licensed attorney for advice specific to their legal situation. The views expressed are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of any individuals or institutions shown. This video is not intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer, and does not promote unlawful behavior. It is created solely to inform the public about constitutional rights, law enforcement practices, and police accountability.
Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction.
FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.
Original video (bodycam): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zc8BWaRxhPA
Dashcam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vRyCgH-ZoQs
Snarky Arky Libertarian’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/@SnarkyArkyLibertarian
Sources:
Ark. Code § 27-16-601- https://bit.ly/42gvxTO
Pennsylvania v. Mimms- https://bit.ly/39nFjsF
Ark. Code § 5-54-102- https://bit.ly/4tSUrVp
Keeton v. State- https://bit.ly/4mBte7p
Ark. Code § 5-54-103- https://bit.ly/41GanhS
Graham v. Connor- https://bit.ly/3vk7YaX
Brown v. City of Golden Valley- https://bit.ly/4tdT4Re
Kohorst v. Smith- https://bit.ly/4vDLoJK
Tatum v. Robinson- https://bit.ly/4euX8YN
That cop has definitely forced himself upon some poor girl/guy
She stupid but the officer could have used deescalation
You and your C- Oh they didn't kill anybody C- They failed its called a D why you so afraid of it?
This fool is using jiu jitsu terms when his jiu jitsu was trash. 🤣😂🥰😍🤣😂
I don't agree that she wasn't given a meaningful opportunity to comply. She was asked for ID and was given 18 seconds to comply before being ordered out of the car. She was given 40 seconds to get out of the car after being ordered, and she physically resisted by grabbing the officer's arm. She was given 16 seconds to comply after being ordered to walk back to the car and again physically resisted.
She completely understood what was happening, and was given enough time for it to be clear that she wasn't taking time to process the orders, she was actively trying to delay and resist as much as possible.
Like 30 seconds into the stop; if I ask again you’re going to jail, crazy!
You have to know when to exercise your right and how to, she was playing a stupid game from the start.
What a job… even if you screw up, you are not monetarily responsible but we the taxpayer get to pay for it and he prances off to make more chaos.
She is stupid and annoying, but his reaction is out of line. This is a customer service job… you have to be able to deal with stupid and annoying people.
maybe dont try and hold court while an officer asks for ID (which you're required to provide) and you wont be arrested? the cop in my opinion did nothing wrong, SHE turned it into something bigger. you can't refuse to id because you dont think you were speeding, take the ticket to court! common sense is not common
Fire this cop
"You made it way bigger than it needed to be"
Who's making it bigger? She simply asked a question, you escalated because you're a big strong man that shall not be questioned
he just wanted to hurt somebody, his mind was made up as soon as he woke up that day.
Zero tolerance for waiting a brief moment.
What an ahole.
Totally unsuitable for the job and a danger to the public he's supposed to 'serve and protect'. I hope this 'officer' is sacked before he does something more serious.
I'm not going to defend the early taser threat, though it did bring about the intended result of compliance rather quickly. Setting that aside, my hot take is that this officer did in two minutes what would have otherwise been stretched out to twenty. In so many other similar videos, this same process plays out the exact same way over a longer period of time. Multiple, direct requests for documentation is ignored. Demand to see proof despite the cop not being obligated to do so – court isn't held on the road. Multiple, clear requests for her to exit the vehicle are also ignored. Any pulling away during an attempt to handcuff a suspect very often ends up with them being put on the ground. It seems like most of ATA's grade for the officer comes from a lack of the over-abundance of patience that end up being the most frustrating part of these sorts of stops. Only after they cross the line that ends an officer's patience do they claim they will then comply with the officer's lawful order. The officer probably could have repeated his request another dozen times, and they still would have ended up in the exact same spot.
She could of handled the situation better. But that shitty cop went hands on in less then a min.
Cop did nothing wrong. Period.
Gang mentality all those big dudes and no one shows digression or humanity idc how can they treat someone like that if you did that to your wife you'd be in jail and be labeled an abuser smh no way these guys should be law enforcement
The grades this channel gives never make sense to me.
In this one both cop and citizen get a passing grade when one of them broke the law. Either the cop broke the law using excessive force or the citizen broke the law resisting arrest. They both don't deserve a passing grade for that.
To me a driver gets an A if they manage to keep their mouth shut and end the stop quickly. Trying to argue the issue at the stop is D student stuff.
The cop gets an A if they calm situations down and minimize the violence needed to do so. In this one I would give the cop a D because he didn't seem to say or do anything that would calm the situation down instead his words, tone and orders increased the tension and caused more problems.
I expect every single human collecting my tax dollars to have more than 5 seconds worth of patience with the public they serve.
With a temper like that……that man should NEVER be allowed to be a cop or do any job where he has to deal with the public. That man is clearly a danger to the general public.
Legally you have the right to see the evidence being used against you
His personality is not cohesive with his responsibilities. An asshole with an ego who can't handle a little authority.
Guy has that braindead psycho voice…
In case that cop (or even all these cops) is married or has a girlfriend, i'd suggest a welfare check on her… on a daily basis. I can’t imagine this guy being in a relationship with a woman that isn’t controlling or abusive toward her.
America 😂😂
All she had to do was not be a dumb argumentative asshole