Idaho Murders Suspect Bryan Kohberger’s Affidavit is ‘Nothing Strange’: Scott Peterson’s Ex-Lawyer

32 thoughts on “Idaho Murders Suspect Bryan Kohberger’s Affidavit is ‘Nothing Strange’: Scott Peterson’s Ex-Lawyer”

1. 

   @georgesontag2192 10/15/2025 at 9:54 PM · Edit

   His dna on the knife sheath, his car in the area, the eye witness with his bushy eyebrows, his behavior with gloves throwing his garbage in the neighbors is not just a coincidence. O J simpsons blood all over the crime scene is a coincidence too ?

2. 

   @paulashipley5992 10/15/2025 at 9:54 PM · Edit

   Why believe her

3. 

   @foremansfolley 10/15/2025 at 9:54 PM · Edit

   This woman is nuts

4. 

   @xKarenWalkerx 10/15/2025 at 9:54 PM · Edit

   Why have his dad fly in and drive with him back to PA?

   Why was he silent in class when they brought up this case but not every other case?

   These are the hard facts that the jury will be thinking about when they’re trying to look beyond reasonable doubt.

5. 

   @hotboy80baby18 10/15/2025 at 9:54 PM · Edit

   The state case is weak

6. 

   @golnaz.shoush 10/15/2025 at 9:54 PM · Edit

   She is an A..HOL.

7. 

   @noturningback2023 10/15/2025 at 9:54 PM · Edit

   No way. The DNA testing of the sheath of the knife actually led them to Kohbergers father. She's looney tunes. What was the knife sheath DOING in the bedroom??? Duh.

8. 

   @bretthousley5502 10/15/2025 at 9:54 PM · Edit

   If he was this sloppy already there is more coming in the car and computer.

9. 

   @Cmthankyoujesus 10/15/2025 at 9:54 PM · Edit

   I like this lawyer, she's good

10. 

    @oscarvaladez6407 10/15/2025 at 9:54 PM · Edit

    DNA has to be in the car 💯

11. 

    @nathanhardee7601 10/15/2025 at 9:54 PM · Edit

    Gonna be a DNA case it's obvious

12. 

    @dougthomson5544 10/15/2025 at 9:54 PM · Edit

    Good God, the DNA isn’t even admissible … the guy may be as guilty as sin or as pure as an angel, I don’t know, but the evidence “reported” seems awfully weak.

13. 

    @martinhumble 10/15/2025 at 9:54 PM · Edit

    – I murdered them by mistake
    – They fell on my knife by mistake
    – I'm not me
    – The killer isn't me as I was there
    – There is no proof of me killing them as I did
    – USA, USA, USA

14. 

    @411w44 10/15/2025 at 9:54 PM · Edit

    DM 💙😔😘❤🙏

15. 

    @theq-1 10/15/2025 at 9:54 PM · Edit

    Maybe be was supplying drugs to that house that night…explains why he drove around , and why he went out at 2am. Also explains why his cell had been then in last 6 months and why DM didnt call the cops… just a thought.

16. 

    @jlind3891 10/15/2025 at 9:54 PM · Edit

    I agree. Weak evidence so far. He could also be a druggie still and be buying selling drugs around universities hence travels to Moscow and turned off sell phone and not reporting car to police.
    Circumstantial evidence could mean very bad luck. Sometimes when you through the dices you get Yahtzee but it very rare. But it happens. If they don’t find internet evidence like him stalking them online or a connection o don’t know.

17. 

    @Treys_Waterboy 10/15/2025 at 9:54 PM · Edit

    Somebody please tell her about his phone being close enough to connect to the house Wi-Fi. 10 miles away? 🤦🏼‍♀️

18. 

    @eccentric3687 10/15/2025 at 9:54 PM · Edit

    I love to hear more from the defense lawyers 😍👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼

19. 

    @badpisces. 10/15/2025 at 9:54 PM · Edit

    Guys a square

20. 

    @christ.4977 10/15/2025 at 9:54 PM · Edit

    If I were on the jury I'd be confident, just based on the preliminary evidence, that he's guilty. I'm sure there's much more to come.

21. 

    @golgicomplex1179 10/15/2025 at 9:54 PM · Edit

    I won’t be surprise if this is like another steven avery case where LEs planted a piece of evidence to corroborate seemingly significant circumstantial evidences.

22. 

    @marymary20 10/15/2025 at 9:54 PM · Edit

    This ain’t all the evidence. This is just enough for probable cause.

23. 

    @alldaydavis3 10/15/2025 at 9:54 PM · Edit

    what is circumstantial about having his car on video on his campus that night, at that hour

24. 

    @str8outtacostco53 10/15/2025 at 9:54 PM · Edit

    If this evidence isn't strong enough for a conviction, I dread what's going to happen in the Delphi case. They barely have anything

25. 

    @mvp1116 10/15/2025 at 9:54 PM · Edit

    If he beats the case, expect more college kids to get slaughtered

26. 

    @wendy-leemorrissirrom8636 10/15/2025 at 9:54 PM · Edit

    The jury will see through this

27. 

    @davewitmer1557 10/15/2025 at 9:54 PM · Edit

    Horrible interview. Check her bar license. The eyewitness description of a man leaving the house is direct evidence not circumstantial. Also, Brian’s DNA was found next to the murder victims and it was on the sheath for the knife he used.It’s Ridiculous to argue that his DNA was left at a different time or transferred.Won’t work in this case.
    The totality of evidence is overwhelming but there’s always the lawyer who has nothing to do with the case seeking attention. Pray for the victims!

28. 

    @libbygarcia6354 10/15/2025 at 9:54 PM · Edit

    Very smart

29. 

    @truthisoutthere6721 10/15/2025 at 9:54 PM · Edit

    BRYAN IS NOT GUILTY!!!!

30. 

    @toddschultz7477 10/15/2025 at 9:54 PM · Edit

    After watching Darell Brooks with a Low IQ represent himself, I want to see Bryan with a higher IQ represent himself ……………….😎

31. 

    @artfrommymind1096 10/15/2025 at 9:54 PM · Edit

    But added all together holes or not ppppplease.

32. 

    @hqcart1 10/15/2025 at 9:54 PM · Edit

    Cellphone tower pings are not as she described it, What she described (10 miles range) is cellphone tower registration, The ping is a trio ping, meaning, your position is pinged by 3 towers each of 120 degrees to determine your exact location (100 feet error), so the map drawn was accurate, and such data is easy to be obtained.
    On the other hand, I think the dude will walk free because the investigator has no more evidence.

Comments are closed.