Idaho Student Murders: Most Notable Weaknesses in Bryan Kohberger’s Affidavit

Idaho Student Murders: Most Notable Weaknesses in Bryan Kohberger’s Affidavit

Criminal defense attorney Lara Yeretsian identifies the most notable weaknesses in Bryan Kohberger’s affidavit that the accused Idaho student murderer’s defense should attack. The Law&Crime Network’s Jesse Weber discusses these weaknesses with Yeretsian, who helped defend convicted murderer Scott Peterson.

Listen to Law&Crime’s Sidebar Podcast on Apple & Spotify:
Apple: https://apple.co/3wMgRgB
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3wITe7b

Hosts:
Jesse Weber: https://twitter.com/jessecordweber
Angenette Levy: https://twitter.com/Angenette5

Guest:
Lara Yeretsian: https://twitter.com/LaraYeretsian

LAW&CRIME SIDEBAR PRODUCTION:
YouTube Management – Bobby Szoke
Podcasting – Sam Goldberg
Video Editing – Michael Deininger
Guest Booking – Alyssa Fisher
Social Media Management – Kiera Bronson

#IdahoFour #BryanKohberger #LawandCrime

STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on YouTubeTV: https://bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime’s Daily Newsletter: https://bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3td2Iqo

LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lawandcrime/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/LawCrimeNetwork
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/lawandcrime
Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@lawandcrime

LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: https://lawandcrime.com/podcasts/

SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK YOUTUBE CHANNELS:
Main Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCz8K1occVvDTYDfFo7N5EZw
Law&Crime Shorts: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVXOqoOCYbi-iXChKAl6DTQ
Channel B: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXCLaaClAWQiTkl3pw9ZdLw
Channel C: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMV3pzWIhJGLYzoHyxBjjNw

source

Share this post

42 thoughts on “Idaho Student Murders: Most Notable Weaknesses in Bryan Kohberger’s Affidavit

  1. Let’s be real here…. Anyone getting called up for Jury duty in the US that’s under 40 years old, by now, is NOT a trustworthy or in any way smart person at all!

  2. they got nothin on Kohburger …. he didnt do it…they just needed to pin it on someone…proly a cover up ..maybe even involving the CIA. i bet goncalves figured out something she wasnt supposed to with her crime investigations…

  3. Having to listen to her reasoning is so revolting. Its literally like listening to someone explain how to gaslight. Just knowing she worked on the defense of Scott Peterson is offputting.

  4. Remember that in a previous case last year, an attorney general did NOT consider strong cell-tower data showing the defendant was at a certain location maybe 10 times over a brief period of time AND that information was treated as unreliable even with videos of defendant at the same time as the tower showed. It was considered worthless.

  5. Why would BK be driving around near the victim’s house late at night; and early in the morning 12 different times?
    He has no friends in the neighborhood of his victims because if he did they would have gone to the police station to explain why BK was at their house late at night; and early in the morning.

  6. I'm a firm believer in our rights as Americans, innocent until proven guilty, sure . BUT…….. IF he is presumed ' Innocent ' until proven then why does he have NO Option for bond?

  7. Those hours he could have been buying drugs. They sa it was a trap house.

    Also he would have to have their password originally to.connect to the wifi. After that it would most likely connect automatically

  8. LE doesn’t put anything in PCA more than necessary to get arrest. Not sure pings will even be raised in trial if LE gets gps data from phone and/ or car

  9. HERE'S HOW YOU POKE HOLES IN ALL THE CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE THEY'VE TOLD US ABOUT SO FAR…..ITS POSSIBLE THAT HE GAVE THE KNIFE TO ONE OF THE GIRLS TO PROTECT HERSELF AND MAY HAVE HEARD ABOUT THERE BEING A STALKER…HE COULD ALSO SAY SOMEONE WHO ANSWERED HIS AD TOLD HIM HE WAS GOING TO KILL THESE PEOPLE ,BUT FOR NOW LETS JUST SAY THERE REALLY WAS A STALKER ,MAYBE HE WAS WATCHING THE HOUSE ACTING AS THIER PROTECTOR,(WHICH WOULD BE A REASON TO "PROTECT" THEM IN EITHER CAS AND THE REAL REASON XANA MOVED OUT) ….HE MAY HAVE SEEN THE KILLER LEAVING THE HOUSE SO HE WENT TO THE HOUSE AND KNOCKED ON THE DOOR AND GOT NO ANSWER SO HE WENT IN THE HOUSE, HENCE THE "THERE'S SOMEBODY IN THE HOUSE" THAT WAS SAID ..ONCE IN THE HOUSE HE SAW ALL THE BLOOD COMING OUT OF XANA'S ROOM,HE WENT IN THE ROOM SAW WHAT HAD HAPPENED AND THATS WHY…IF IT WAS HIM …HE SAID "IT'S OK I'M HERE TO HELP YOU"….WHEN HE SAW IT WAS HOPELESS, PANICKED AND DECIDED HE'D BETTER GET OUT OF THERE..AS HE WAS LEAVING THATS WHEN DYLAN SAW HIM AND THATS WHY SHE WASN'T KILLED..AND HIS PHONE BEING OFF MAYBE HIS PHONE DIED AND HE WAS CHARGING IT…..TO ME THIS SCENARIO COVERS ANY OF THE EVIDENCE SHOWN SO FAR..

Comments are closed.