Canceled Welfare Check Uncovers Triple Murder

Canceled Welfare Check Uncovers Triple Murder

Welcome to your Daily Dose of Crime! Here, we bring you exclusive footage of police encounters, focusing on transparency and accountability in government actions.

We provide a mix of educational and newsworthy content, giving you a closer look at public safety issues. Our mission is to share genuine exclusive police footage to help you better understand the work and challenges faced by law enforcement.

Our videos are designed to be engaging, informative, and to increase your understanding of the importance of law enforcement in keeping us safe and secure.

🔴Disclaimer
â–ºThe content featured on Daily Dose Of Crime is intended for informational and educational purposes only. The views and opinions expressed in the videos are not meant to shame, ridicule, or harm the individuals involved or viewers.

———-
📩 For general questions/business inquiries/sponsorships/video submissions/copyright issues please contact us at:

co*********************@***il.com
———-
© 2024 Daily Dose Of Crime. All rights reserved.

source

Share this post

42 thoughts on “Canceled Welfare Check Uncovers Triple Murder

  1. I am somewhat confused by this story. The police report submitted for Jan 25, 2025, at 3:43 on this video actually had nothing to do with this particular video. The police statement provided here stated that 3 individuals were found dead within the home, and it was a grim crime scene. But at 23:24, when the officer is speaking to Kane Mayes, he tells him they didn't find any signs of struggles or foul play. Finally, at the end of this video at 32:06 the commentator stated the 3 victims' bodies were found in an overturned burnt Subaru in Nogal Canyon two days later. This obviously didn't happen in New Hampshire, but New Mexico. When the Sheriff's dept did a welfare check in the video at 20:21, the video stated there were fresh stains and bloody clothing. However, when the officer spoke to Kane, he said there were no signs of foul play? Therefore, it appears to me that perhaps the police reports were confused with the one in New Hampshire or what? Did any other viewers notice the differences in the storyline and posted police report on this video? Or is there an explanation that I didn't see?

  2. People like the chatterbox mentioned in other comments can’t help themselves. They truly don’t know how to get directly to the point. The whole story is the point for them. 😂

  3. All right, dadgum it. But if I find out that’s not really Eric or Eric’s voice, I’m NOT going to be a happy subscriber. That’s all I’m saying. ❤❤❤

  4. I can understand why so many are calling this guy a chatterbox, but to me it seems he believes something is very wrong and is trying to get his concerns across to the officer. I imagine he is upset and nervous and doesn't want to leave out something that could be important.

  5. I fast forwarded all the guys chit chat. We didn't need all that really. Made the video 10 minutes longer for zero reasons. Unnecessary. I normally love love love your content dude.

  6. And what’s the reason why we can’t see their faces? It’s not like they’re very blurred out as you can kinda see what they might look like, but not enough that you’d be able to recognize them. And since we had to listen to the first guy talk and talk and talk, we should be able to see what they look like as a constellation 🤔

  7. Hey guys I love your content but you keep calling the guy giving info at the beginning the victim's neighbour but he states multiple times that it's his brother-in-law with whom he takes care of his mother-in-law and I'm not sure how you guys missed that! The other thing was that it wasn't made clear if the brother-in-law reporting to the cops at the start did they already know the people were dead? Had they been identified when the cop went up to the house? It was really confusing the timeline of events from finding the car and the peope being missing.

Comments are closed.