Cara Rintala faces her fourth trial for the 2010 murder of her wife, 37-year-old Annamarie Cochrane-Rintala. Authorities say was strangled to death in the Massachusetts home the married couple shared. The slain woman was found at the bottom of their basement staircase, bloody and beaten, cold to the touch, and covered in paint.
#CaraRintala #StrangledWifeMurder #lawandcrime
Read more on this case: https://bit.ly/45DyH41
STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on YouTubeTV: https://bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime’s Daily Newsletter: https://bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3td2Iqo
For Licensing Inquiries, Please Contact: licensing@lawandcrime.com
LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lawandcrime/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/LawCrimeNetwork
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/lawandcrime
Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@lawandcrime
LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: https://lawandcrime.com/podcasts/
SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK YOUTUBE CHANNELS:
Main Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCz8K1occVvDTYDfFo7N5EZw
Law&Crime Shorts: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVXOqoOCYbi-iXChKAl6DTQ
Channel B: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXCLaaClAWQiTkl3pw9ZdLw
Channel C: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMV3pzWIhJGLYzoHyxBjjNw
5:38:02
Is that a fishing pole pointer?
Guilty
Just in time
this bottle blond defense atty is embarassing herself. she thinks shes clever, but is not coming off as such. i bet she is a capricorn.
The defense attorney calls objections like I call BINGO !
What happened to the rest of this trial?
The bleach blond defense is a vile creature. Narcissitic and vile
I don't understand why this defence attorney is being allowed to testify about Mark A 😮
Weak judge
This defense attorney is disgusting!!! She is the rudest, bombastic defense attorney that I have ever had the displeasure to watch. PLEASE DON'T TELL ME SHE IS JUST DOING HER JOB. If I ever spoke to or treated people like this in ANY job I have ever had I would have been FIRED. Should be disbarred!!!!
This woman witness is horrible at answering questions. She made herself look bad imo.
Cara is INNOCENT and they need to leave this woman alone!!! This is the fourth time she’s been on trial for this murder and will not be found guilty of this crime!!! I hope that she sues the crap out of all of the people that are lying about her and hope she gets millions for compensation!!!
why tf does she keep objecting to video evidence?
The lady detective looks like she might twirl the defense bull and toss her out a window.
So what do the prosecutors make of the smear stains? That Cara made them as she walked upstairs after killing Annamarie?
He deleted the 1:53pm text because it has personal medical information about his sister. It wasn't anything nefarious FFS!
It's suspicious and lying when a suspect alters/redacts/shows only select information to the police/investigators/detectives, but it's totally fine when the Judge/Lawyers alter/redact/show only select sections of things to the jury. Love it.
That she kept, addressing the female Lieutenant, as ma’am was cringy-
This defense attorney has zero class
Why is the judge placating to the defense attorney on outrageous objections? The detective is allowed to state what he sees in the video.
Too many sidebars. Screams desperation.
Defense attorney aggressive bulldozer. Being aggressive may work if used selectively but used continuously and especially when she seems to get facts slightly wrong is very offputting if your client is definately innocent.
If her client did actually commit the crime her tactics could work though, so I guess it depends on how you look at it. What I mean by that is that maybe it isn't possible to defend her legitimately so the aggressive tactic is the best solution to create confusion in the jury which may be enough to bring reasonable doubt into their minds.
From my viewing so far I would say there is definately reasonable doubt. She may have snapped over Brianna and regretted it or not even remembered what she did in the heat of the moment but if she did it I don't think it could ever be proven. I would have to vote not guilty even though I aknowledge the relative likelihood of the scenarios I have just mentioned .I'm predicting a fifth mistrial for that reason.
A fine job by the lumbering bleach job of engendering sympathy for her client with her shrill, heavily accented vocal charades. She’s the kind of person who people concede to just to stop hearing her voice.
This trial is in my hometown
I wish the defense lawyer would stop saying right right right right hand for she’s trying to say that Mark Oliver killed her
Are they really trying to claim that this Mark guy killed her because she owed money on the credit cards he opened for her??? That's got to be the dumbest "motive" I have ever heard of! Dead people don't pay off credit cards. If you kill someone who owes you money, they are never going to pay you back. How is that a logical motive???
And what's with all the questions about the dog? If she was asking Mark for money to buy a dog crate that she never bought, do we know what the money did get spent on? Or did she not get a chance to spend it because she was dead before she could? Didn't the aunt say that Cara had asked her to tell Annmarie that they couldn't afford a dog because the aunt was the only person she would listen to??? I think the "last straw" in that argument was about the fact that she was going to get the dog against Cara's wishes. Oddly enough, it's the questions from the defense attorney that have lead me to this conclusion.