WATCH LIVE: Obsessed Ex-Boyfriend Murder Trial — WI v. Zachariah Anderson – Day Four

WATCH LIVE: Obsessed Ex-Boyfriend Murder Trial — WI v. Zachariah Anderson – Day Four

Wisconsin man Zachariah Anderson faces trial for charges in connection with the disappearance and death of Rosalio Gutierrez, Jr. in May 2020. Anderson is charged with first-degree intentional homicide, hiding a corpse, and stalking. Prosecutors allege Anderson stalked his ex-girlfriend and killed her new love interest, Gutierrez, at his Kenosha apartment. Anderson is back on trial after a judge declared a mistrial last year after only two days of testimony. Gutierrez’s body has never been found.

#MurderTrial #Court #LawAndCrime

STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on YouTubeTV: https://bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime’s Daily Newsletter: https://bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3td2Iqo

LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lawandcrime/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/LawCrimeNetwork
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/lawandcrime
Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@lawandcrime

LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: https://lawandcrime.com/podcasts/

SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK YOUTUBE CHANNELS:
Main Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCz8K1occVvDTYDfFo7N5EZw
Law&Crime Shorts: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVXOqoOCYbi-iXChKAl6DTQ
Channel B: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXCLaaClAWQiTkl3pw9ZdLw
Channel C: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMV3pzWIhJGLYzoHyxBjjNw

source

Share this post

44 thoughts on “WATCH LIVE: Obsessed Ex-Boyfriend Murder Trial — WI v. Zachariah Anderson – Day Four

  1. 4:59:48 JUDGE YOU ARE WRONG AND THIS IS WHY RIGHT HERE… SHE ARGUED THE SAME THING JUST AS CLEAR, MAYBE NOT AS CALM, BUT THE DEFENSE IS RIGHT…IN THE WORDS OF KEVIN FROM SOUTH MASS…”YOU WRONG.”

  2. 4:41:41 it is relevant when your trying to make it sound like the police didn’t do their job by doing enough DNA testing —-you shot yourself in the foot with all your questions attacking the investigation. If your show sure your client is innocent and the police went after him incorrectly then you could have had them tested to prove the cops wrong —-careful how you attack the investigation because it’s not working out for you

  3. 1:54:02 WOW! There is already a strong appeal building. The defense are the only ones in the room who know what they're doing. The prosecution is taking FULL advantage of the judge's shortcomings. UNREAL.

  4. No DNA from Anderson, but lets blame it on rain. A innocent man is in jail & guiterez is off somewhere living a great life under an assumed name debt free

  5. Regardless of her nails, id take a handy & bj from the defense attorney, she cute, but she is a demon in bed. I'm sure lucky zach got to find out.

  6. This judge seems nice and tries to explain himself but he just forgets to much. Also we are talking about someone's life/death. Dude was a lawyer & a judge. He has enough retirement/ Social security/pension im sure. Hang it up and help with a law firms cases or something. Quit holding lives in your hands when you just got old, happens to the best of us. Nothing mean, nothing negative, hes just old. Im 43 and cant do many things i did when i was 20, im sure in 60's it will be even worse. I wish him the best but please retire.

  7. The Prosecutor is an absolute tool who needs to be put in his place. “Challenge the subject, not the person?” Right. He needs to be challenged by someone. I can’t believe so many people are complaining about the defense attorney when the prosecutor is who he is. I just can’t with the public anymore. I don’t want to know whether or not the defendant is guilty at this point. I just want the prosecutor to stop yelling for no reason. “Accidentally” saying things he just got onto the defense for saying. I could go on and on about double standards and him. Anyway, I don’t think he’s guilty.

  8. She HATES when ppl interrupt her unintentionally BUT she over talks everyone in that courtroom most important and rude the JUDGE! She also pretty much tells the judge to hush she is talking but he tries to cut her off to stop all these speaking objections!

  9. As much as I cant stand the defense attorney… Im afraid that there will be an appeal granted because it seems like the judge has quite a bit of bias towards the prosecutor. He rules in their favor most of the time and almost makes arguments for them 😂

  10. She is absolutely ridiculous. Go to etiquette school and grow up… act like a grown up adult woman. And… nobody went in or out of that bedroom window! Move on!!

  11. I wouldn't right off the judge that quick… yes he is very measured in his speach… but I would have to compare to when he was younger… it could just be his way. Ive seen him in at least another high profile case… the Kyle Rittenhouse case when his speech was as measured as now and he was very though on the public prosecutor, if i rememnber correctly! Defense lawyer is doing her job and I wouldn't mind having a lawyer who was defending me with that much gusto like she is! I dont find her rude… she is just doing her job.

  12. As she is testifying Mr. Anderson is staring without blinking at her. I hope she doesn't look at him. This judge needs to retire. There should be an age limit for judges to rule over a court. He sounds like a horn with all this AAAGHHH, AAAAGH,. Most judges don't have to explain why they overrule or sustain a statement.

  13. I can't believe the judge is letting shifting the burden happen in this case! The defense is correct. The person accused doesn't need to investigate on their own. That is ridiculous.

  14. About 4:25 in. If it becomes up to the defense to test items that were at the crime scene for fingerprints and DNA, that means suspect isconduct the investigation. How is this even being debated!?

  15. Schroeder makes so many bad rulings on these objections… The defense is clearly correct in their objection regarding the marijuana grow operation at the defendant's residence (as well as the touch DNA issue). It's irrelevant, prejudicial, and a good ground for appeal.

  16. I'm sure being a judge can be grueling at times…But this poor guy should've hung up his robe a long time ago…He rambles and loses his train of thought consistantly…I actually feel bad for him….

  17. Has to be the worst judge and state attorney ever , they are screwing this defendant over by allowing some of this stuff to take place , I can’t even watch this trial because of this crap being allowed to happen

  18. Ms. Muller is a complete waste of time. This is what inexperience with a huge dose of overconfidence looks like. Don't even get me started on her crazy eyes. She has no respect for the jurors time. Classic case of if you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with BS.

Comments are closed.