WATCH LIVE: Lawyer Accused of Mom’s Murder Trial Takes The Stand – GA v. Richard Merritt – Day Three

WATCH LIVE: Lawyer Accused of Mom’s Murder Trial Takes The Stand – GA v. Richard Merritt – Day Three

“Disgraced lawyer Richard Merritt faces trial for allegedly killing his mother on the day he was supposed to report to prison for financial crimes in February 2019. Prosecutors allege Merritt brutally stabbed and beat 77-year-old Shirley Merritt to death after she cooked him his last meal — leaving plates on the table and pots on the stove. Richard was arrested and charged when US Marshals caught him eight months later in Tennessee living under an alias.”

Read more on the case and get live updates: https://bit.ly/45tpAn6

#RichardMerritt #DisgracedLawyerTrial #LawandCrime

STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on YouTubeTV: https://bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime’s Daily Newsletter: https://bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3td2Iqo

LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lawandcrime/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/LawCrimeNetwork
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/lawandcrime
Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@lawandcrime

LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: https://lawandcrime.com/podcasts/

SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK YOUTUBE CHANNELS:
Main Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCz8K1occVvDTYDfFo7N5EZw
Law&Crime Shorts: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVXOqoOCYbi-iXChKAl6DTQ
Channel B: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXCLaaClAWQiTkl3pw9ZdLw
Channel C: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMV3pzWIhJGLYzoHyxBjjNw

source

Share this post

36 thoughts on “WATCH LIVE: Lawyer Accused of Mom’s Murder Trial Takes The Stand – GA v. Richard Merritt – Day Three

  1. Does anyone know if there was a pre•trial motion granted or an ongoing overruled objection to be able to use statements his mother (supposedly) said that are an exception to the hearsay rule?!

    I'm super behind sorry in advance!

  2. Dude has to throw in as absolute much as possible something pertaining to him being either a lawyer in life OR when he was in law school such as "when did y'all get married" answer: "I graduated law school in 99' and we married a week later" AND "what type of lifestyle were y'all living" answer: "blah blah blah going to neighborhood cookout or going to some type of lawyer event" it's non stop!

  3. He is a vile criminal stealing huge amounts of money from innocent victims and shows contempt for the victims and no concern for anyone but himself and tries to make out he is a hero for caring for his daghter and family while throwing money around and living a life of luxury. I was in a fury when he said two strangers came to his mother's door with guns and then slaughtered his poor mother and hey no he didn't get shot or have a scratch on this monster, what bs, he slaughtered his mother, didn't call the police but cut of his ankle monitor, took his poor tortured mother's car and leaves her to rot, he buys water, snacks and gas and drives off again. I am going back to the cross but had to rant; I am so disgusted by this vile, deceitful narcissistic scum. Xx

  4. Mr. Merritt refers to his deceased mother as “the body”. He refers to the alleged murderers of his mother as “gentlemen”. He never attributes statements to the individual murderers, only that “*they* said ‘Don’t tell anyone or else’“. He doesn’t shed a tear or show any emotion during his testimony other than annoyance with the prosecutor during cross examination. He refers to his stealing hundreds of thousands of dollars from his elderly clients as “when things went south”. How he thought that his testimony would convince the jury of his innocence completely escapes me!

  5. I highly recommend increasing the playback speed to 1.50 during the medical examiner’s testimony – it makes his constant “umms” much more tolerable. You won’t miss anything because he speaks so slowly.

  6. what was the purpose of these murderers to kill your mother, would have been one of my questions to him, then the next would have been why do you think the murderers let you go after witnessing what they did to your mother? so many questions that could have led him without him knowing it tell on himself..

  7. The prosecution sucked at cross-examining this guy! She missed so many opportunities to point out conflicting statements he made in his own testimony. And the thing that stood out to me the most, was when he described (on direct exam) what he did immediately after these “gentleman” (as he calls them) left the house. He did several things. But the one thing he did NOT do was go straight to his mother to try to render aid, or at the very LEAST, to hold her hand or something, to say goodbye or that he loved her. Like a normal son would do after seeing his mother murdered.

    The prosecution should have pointed that out to the jury. She also should’ve pointed out that he kept referring to the murderers as GENTLEMEN. Luckily the jury was smart enough to see through him, but NO THANKS to the prosecution.

  8. 5:17:45 QUOTE: “The GENTLEMAN who pushed her down the stairs”.

    It’s interesting that immediately before that, he says, “the GUY who had a gun to MY back”. But then he refers to the guy who’s assaulting/killing his elderly MOTHER, as a GENTLEMAN. It’s proof he’s lying, because if that really happened, no one would refer to their mother’s assailant as a “gentleman”. But it’s also very revealing of his mindset, since HE’S the one who assaulted and killed his mother. He’s telling us that he considers himself a gentleman, despite having brutally murdered his own mother.

  9. You know, just watching the court officers attending during all these court hearings, arguments, & attempts by various attorneys to have certain evidence admitted or denied entry, I wonder how much they learn. I bet a lot!..gotta appreciate those dudes!

  10. 2:22:46 – The letter that defense all of a sudden tries to introduce in evidence is a JOKE!
    Man… what a bunch of amateur lawyers this defendant has. Or maybe they are just too lazy to do some real effort to come with a more realistic defense.

  11. Somehow I must have missed part. No detective? No talk about crime and why son suspect. There is no way he was at home and 2 bad guys came in do him no harm but push elderly woman down stairs, stab her, leave blade in and drops a 35 lb dumbbell on her.

  12. Love how he glossed over the house he and his wife owned with dodgy evasions like “it was gone” and how his wife “wanted to rent” without explaining why he let the mortgage lapse for 6 months until it would foreclose and how he lied to his wife about making repayments. This is a guy fighting to not be seen as a vile murderer of his mother, but he can’t even be honest about his previous lies and manipulations. He even glossed over his previous crime as if he was surprised by the extent of all the things of which he was accused. Pathetic. He can’t even be honest about that, and he surely isn’t honest about the way his mom died.

  13. I'm not impressed with this prosecutor. We know he's a liar. It's clear he lies like he blinks. Just because someone is a liar, that doesn't make them a murderer. I wish she'd point out how unnatural and unbelievable his behavior was if he really believed his life was in danger. I'm also appalled this defense team allowed him to get up there on the stand and give that absurd, tissue paper thin, ridiculous story.

  14. The main thing I have observed from the prosecution is that she is good at presenting the information she has prepared, but she struggles thinking on the fly. She never seems to bring forth a good argument to counter objections and she seemed unprepared to poke holes in the defendants crap spun by the defendant when he took the stand. Good thing his story is so unbelievable.

Comments are closed.