Uncuffed: Nancy Grace Discusses Daniel Holtzclaw – Crime Watch Daily With Chris Hansen

Uncuffed: Nancy Grace Discusses Daniel Holtzclaw – Crime Watch Daily With Chris Hansen

Nancy Grace, Chris Hansen, and Mark Eiglarsh discuss the Daniel Holtzclaw case on Crime Watch Daily segment “Uncuffed.”

Check your local listings at http://crimewatchdaily.com

source

Share this post

22 thoughts on “Uncuffed: Nancy Grace Discusses Daniel Holtzclaw – Crime Watch Daily With Chris Hansen

  1. 😂 Nancy thinks EVERYBODY IN AMERICA is guilty but her! Holtzclaw is innocent of these crimes against him! He's not gonna be a serial rapist against a bunch of old, wrinkled up druggies!

  2. After reviewing the case, I thought he was guilty and the more I dug into more detail I thought he could be perhaps innocent. THEN I watched a full interview with one of the Jurors and I realized they got this case right. Was the punishment excessive?! of course, some of the witnesses were a JOKE and have zero credibility. However, this former officer did some extremely suspect things. Turning off the computers – Not calling in the pull overs, going to peoples houses, GPS locations etc… The guy is a certified bone head. Again, after the full interview with the Juror, I feel they got it right.

  3. Nancy's opener sums up her caricature in a nutshell: “To believe him, you would have to disbelieve 13 women! And the fact that they are low-income african-american makes it even worse!" The fact that they are poor or a minority makes disbelieving them worse? Or the fact that his alleged crime was perpetrated against low income ethnic women makes the alleged crime worse? But if they were rich white chicks then his alleged crime, and our skepticism wouldn't be so bad? Crazy, all this time I thought considering the victims' socioeconomic and ethnic status might bias your judgment when determining if the evidence proves guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Just your standard rage bait incoherence from Nancy 'Jerry Springer' Grace

  4. I was curious to hear Grace's take on this, but she was unsufferable from the beginning. "Don't tell me what I know." He wasn't. He was illustrating how basic lawyer knowledge, which they both share, is not necessarily as ubiquitous as her lack of self-awareness.

  5. Coincidentally and against policy, he turned off computer, radio, gps, did not log stop… bad luck, just then he was accused by a lady who was not given a ticket or arrested, and underwent medical evidence extraction procedure. Is the moral here, don’t break department policy and don’t put yourself at greater risk. He was very deceptive during interview, and lied about sex with his girlfriend. He said, she said… don’t put yourself at risk for accusations, even knowing there are, and maybe motives for false accusations. Don’t put a target on your back… but all the research I’ve done, very likely shows he is guilty of some of the accused crimes. If I was found guilty, being innocent, I wouldn’t have sobbed, I would have screamed my innocence.

Comments are closed.