This video is sponsored by Blinkist. The first 100 people to go to https://www.blinkist.com/AudittheAudit are going to get unlimited access for one week to try it out. You’ll also get 25% off if you want the full membership!

Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit

Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit

Submit your videos here: auditheaudit@gmail.com

Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellifyagency.com

Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.

This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.

Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.

FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.

Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkhrXPur4ws

Amagansett Press’ channel:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCIYocUCja9Ug_XiYROeb_cw

Sources:

Poster 7 (USPS)- https://bit.ly/3mUR1A7

39 CFR §232.1- https://bit.ly/2QxE17H

Requests for Filming and Still Photography on Postal Service Premises- https://bit.ly/3agDMoz

Postal Opera­tions Manual- https://bit.ly/2OY4Xgo

United States v. Kokinda- https://bit.ly/3gm5m7x

Department of Justice Criminal Resource Manual §1630- https://bit.ly/3sseLwN

18 USC §7- https://bit.ly/3xcCeWu

18 USC §3061- https://bit.ly/3aeuR6L

CRS §18-9-110- https://bit.ly/3wZAHTr

CRS §18-4-504- https://bit.ly/2RCLKSh

CRS §18-4-504.5- https://bit.ly/2Q8qseZ

CRS §18-4-201- https://bit.ly/3aiboCg

18 USC §13- https://bit.ly/3dmIKlA

Article: https://bit.ly/3tdncxj

source

37 thoughts on “Town Pays $10,000 After Police Encounter”
  1. I've been wondering if one can be trespassed from public property. Sounds like it varies from state to state. But I still don't understand how you can be punished for trespassing if you haven't been given a written warning.

  2. Why would post offices and police not use these 'laws' you claim to stop filming on postal property? What you say doesn't make sense because if this were true thousands of videos and police calls would be avoided by stopping what hae turmed into a phenomenon. Inconsistent following of rules and laws is what causes confusion anger and prejudice accusations.

  3. is there a difference between free speech and free press in the notiob of a "public forum"
    I'd think poibting a camera or writ8ng down words in a notebook would be different from using a bullhorn or organizing a march or sacrificing a goat on public property.

  4. those asswipes VERY WELL KNEW THEY CANT TRESSPASS ANYBODY at the postoffice.

    no matter what u said this time.
    UR WRONG.
    and even the postal imployees knew that.
    why else would they settle any dispute.
    ??????????????

    they acted like todlers and ap winning outside court proves IM RIGHT.

    WHAT a bunch of a..holes that CLEARLY DONT know their job😅😅😅
    what a joke

  5. I have a question for all those 1A Auditors (frauditors), SovCits, and Moorish Nationals.
    Can you show me anywhere in the U.S. Constitution where it says that you have the right to pass a school bus stopped to pickup or drop off students? Does it state in the constitution that you have rights to do this? No?
    So, does that make it right to pass school buses that are stopped, with disregard to public safety.
    You most likely will agree that it is not allowed. Now, is there a law on the books in most States that prohibit this action?
    If you say yes, then you agree that the States have the right to protect all people by making a policy or statute or law.

    How does this make sense, but disobeying judge mandated policies, statutes or laws, does not?
    The tenth amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which, under the 12th article of the Constitution states this:

    Twelfth Article
    The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

    The purpose of this amendment is to reaffirm the principles of federalism and reinforce the notion of the Federal Government maintaining only limited, enumerated powers. Legal scholars (including textualists and originalists) have effectively classified the amendment as a tautology, a statement affirming that the federal government does not have any rights that it does not have.[

    Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom, and independence, and every power, jurisdiction, and right, which is not by this Confederation expressly delegated to the United States, in Congress assembled.

    So, how can you pick and choose which laws, statutes, or policies that you want to follow, just to try to make a fictitious assertion? How can you? As Will Ferrell said on SNL “are you English, or just stupid?”

  6. If you read the full poster 7 it says why you're not allowed to film. So basically you have to have permission from postmaster. Plus amagansett press is using peoples likenesses for commercial use because they're getting paid on youtube. Basically all the actors in the movie dont get paid. Jason and Ben gain all the profit.

  7. Phew audit the audit really dropped the ball on this video. Police officers violated a constitutional right clearly and gets a B while the calm well informed person wins a 9k settled lawsuit gets a c- uh oh

  8. Hey ATA.. there is a video out there..can’t remember whose…they talked on the phone with the federal media people in charge of USPS…and they told them they WERE allowed to film as long as they didn’t disrupt services or start arguments with patrons or employees. So who is in the right or wrong. The USPS employee is who made that phone call and brought it out to the auditor on speakerphone for the WORLD to see

Leave a Reply