🎉 Get up to 50% OFF a Babbel subscription! ➡️ Here: https://go.babbel.com/6m50-youtube-audittheaudit-march-2021/default

Second Channel: http://bit.ly/2CD2b6j

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit

Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit

Submit your videos here: auditheaudit@gmail.com

Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellifyagency.com

Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.

This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.

Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.

FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.

Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-0QVhEdqyxI

Billings Gazette’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCoumKpcPlYB3z1C4h1MlzQg

Sources:

Bureau of Indian Affairs FAQs- https://on.doi.gov/3fvNS8t

Fiftieth Congress. Sess. I. Ch. 213- https://bit.ly/3uc0Oo0

Article 1, Section 8- https://bit.ly/3cFhPB8

Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe- https://bit.ly/3cHV5Aj

Duro v. Reina- https://bit.ly/39w5mxy

Strate v. A-1 Contractors- https://bit.ly/2R07p6I

United States v. Cooley- https://bit.ly/2OieuP4

United States v. Cooley (SCOTUS Blog)- https://bit.ly/2PunPDZ

25 USC 5501- https://bit.ly/39Ayx2C

25 USC 5502- https://bit.ly/2QOdFyb

Gobin v. Snohomish County- https://bit.ly/3fAJ2GW

Indian Reorganization Act of 1948: https://bit.ly/2R7XX1d

News Articles-
https://bit.ly/3rAcOxY
https://bit.ly/31tPiYX
https://bit.ly/3szWFKj
https://bit.ly/3cFZPXi

source

29 thoughts on “Officer Gets Detained By Tribe”
  1. To be fair to all parties tribal jurisdiction is in fact a ridiculously complex system.
    I was driving down I 90 in a different reservation not all far from here and tribal police pulled me over for speeding he told me he can’t legally ticket me because I was on the interstate which is federal jurisdiction and state troopers. Can’t patrol it because it’s native land so all he can do is tell you to slow down😂😂😂

    Tribal jurisdiction even varies based on who committed the crime whether they are native or non-native and who the victim is whether they are native and non-native, it is ridiculously confusing and impossible to memorize.
    Sometimes it even depends on which reservation you were on due to federal funding allocations

    That being said the game warden should’ve just left and if he was convinced he was in the right he could talk to his supervisor and he can get it squared away later

  2. "Everybody in the country" "9th Circut" – but not their country nor court, the country and court of those who invaded and stole the land now telling the rest of the First People how to live.

  3. If the issue in question is about hunting on their own lands, and having their own set of rules and regulations, apart from U. S. Law, then they're not doing anything wrong, by hunting according to what their Tribal Regulations are.
    This White Guy was WAY out of line! He should've been dealt with, accordingly!

  4. Your argument that hunting on tribal lands impacts non indian lands that are adjacent justifies the game warden in enforcing state law on tribal lands is flawed and offensive.

    If we look at the say the Canada US border and the Canadians do something on their land that impacts US citizens or US game in the US. As long as it doesn't violate international law, tough. It's quite possible for Canadian hunting seasons to be different than US hunting seasons. We have no authority to change Canadian hunting seasons based on its inevitable impact on the game or enforce US hunting regulations on Canadian soil because it impacts game on US lands.

    Therefore we have no right to adjust hunting seasons of the indian nations.

    Admittedly there is a complication with the purchased lands not having the same status as the original lands. Which is the nexus of the dispute here. The indian nation want their law to apply to all of their lands, and do not recognize that the purchased land is not protected in the same manner as the original lands granted to them. The fact the purchased land was done as a part of an exchange further complicates matters, which is no doubt why the Indians are wanting to dispute. I wonder if the land that was exchanged to allow gold mining was returned to the indian nation or not. If the gold mining land is still US land, then the exchange should be done with equal rights or the indian nation has been cheated along the way. Not that the US would ever cheat the Indians.

  5. "It was the eagle on Mount Ickiya that gave us the authority to hunt lands our forefathers kept for us. Over-hunting, over-shmunting, when the bear sleeps we must feed our young like the mountain lions of the Apache mountains" – Chief Kief

  6. These Settler's according to Treaties (Two Row Wampum) once they enter our lands of sovereign Nations then they have no rights because USA laws do NOT apply on traditional territories, and usa laws do not have JURISDICTION what soo ever.
    Learn your TREATIES, ESPECIALLY YOU SETTLERS. YOUR ANCESTOR'S AGREED TO THESE AGREEMENTS AND YOU ALL SHOULD OUT OF RESPECT KNOW THEM.

Leave a Reply