Murder in Aspen: Ski-town socialite killed in her sleep – Everything Law and Order Blog

The hunt for the killer of Nancy Pfister – a celebrated high-society party girl with a notorious life of free love, designer drugs and champagne breakfasts – became a tangled legal fiasco of flimsy evidence and multiple arrests. Updates: http://bit.ly/2x0QMhl

source

By elboriyorker

HOSTING BY PHILLYFINESTSERVERSTAT | ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS. POST QUESTION OR INQUIRIES SEND ME AN EMAIL TO elboriyorkeratgmailcom (www.phillyfinest369.com)

37 thoughts on “Murder in Aspen: Ski-town socialite killed in her sleep”
  1. i knew nancy when i lived i aspen. i babysat her daughter. i did not have sex with her when she requested because she told me she had herpes.

  2. Bottom line nancy was murdered by these 2 evil scumbags and the wife needs to be locked up for life…she knows shes guilty.and if you cant see that your blind and or dumb…

  3. Person has been murdered but the producers have decided to make it more traumatic and add silly audio effects!!!!
    How shallow and empty devoid!!!

  4. I don't buy that the Dr did it. I think he was trying to save his innocent wife. My bet it's that weird ass sheriff dude.

  5. The fact that the self proclaimed killer was a "doctor", hence someone who had sworn by Hyppocrates to do everything in his power to consider people's health as absolute and constant priority number 1 is an important factor. Would he have been a gardener or a home appliances designer, he still would have been a killer, but the fact that he was a doctor, the fact that he stopped after the first blow to check on how the victim was etc. makes it 10 times worse. Now whether his wife got away with murder or not, legally, it no longer mattes: apparantly, there was not sufficient evidence to prove it, so a jury had to conclude there was "reasonable" doubt, hence, she could not be convicted. Whether she was guilty or not from then onwards becomes a purely personal conviction, nothing more, nothing less. The victim doesn't sound as having been a very likeable character, at least not in my book. Socialites rarely are. As a European, it's always funny to see Americans talk about their own "royalty"… That's totally ridiculous. Royalty and nobility comes together with a complex set of norms, rules, rituals etc. Not with thick wallets and pricetags. If there is any royalty within the American population, it might rather be within the grand grand grandchildren of former chiefs of Indian tribes, rather than the Kennedy's or that ridiculous Aspen incrowd.

  6. I am not Columbo but I see a LOT in a single sentence by suspect Nancy. She says at some point that she hated the other Nancy because she disrespected her, she disrespected her as she had never been disrespected before. That doesnt say she helped murder her but it says indeed that the victim may have had it coming to her. People who are entitled and feel a part of royalty, by family or by money, could be incredibly cold, nasty and even purposely cruel with those they consider below them. And if that happened, then she just got it coming and this other Nancy is the real victim after all because without having committed any crime she lost the love of her life because of the actions of a women which should have never crossed her path.

  7. After reading about this case, I realize how disgusting this show is. Basically trying to paint the victim as a horrible person who fights with everyone and brought this on herself while also providing the viewers distorted facts and interviewing a woman who was a prime suspect and is a dubious character who should not be allowed to talk about the victim. And it doesn't matter if she was rich and if she liked to sit on men's laps or if she liked waking around naked, if any of this is even true.

  8. Wow! People, she was murdered! She was hated for her behavior, i didnt hear any criticism of any of the men who were the recipients of her attention. Clearly she was an entitled spoiled person but dang people, she was murdered! I wonder if she would've been so maligned if she had been a man. It also sounds like there were a lot of entitled spoiled folk in that community.

  9. Oh wow that’s narcissistic-blaming the victim – I can’t believe this woman. I think they ran up the bills, couldn’t pay and she was stopping them from working/progress; so they killed her; instead of a civil law suit. People gotta sleep on these impulses. Geez – they coulda had the police get the equipment back.

  10. R.I.P Nancy. You had a wonderful life and unfortunately world is full of pathetic, jealous people. Whoever did this, they could have only dreamed about being you.

  11. Nancy was shaking her head yes, while she's saying no to the questions that the interviewer is asking her if she knew anything about the murder.
    She doesn't cry the whole time about hearing details of how her husband did the murder, but she crys as soon as the interviewer talks about her husband commiting suicide. On top of it all, she blames the victim for her own murder & basically is saying that the victim deserved what she got.
    Sorry, but Nancy definitely was involved somehow, with murdering that woman!

  12. Bro, the ending is brutal.. she is guilty a.f!! She almost slipped a few times, and if you watch her when he asks if she killed or help killed she nods her head and says no

  13. Nope, can't believe she had nothing to do with it. Her nonreaction to her husband's confession is to o unnatural. I think they did it together.

  14. Yeah, this explains everything….
    It's an indigenous curse punishing people who refer to themselves as royalty and they're just common thieves and disrespectful emigrant types 😅😊

Comments are closed.