Contentious jury deliberations break down in Weinstein’s retrial; Karen Read’s defense rests

Contentious jury deliberations break down in Weinstein’s retrial; Karen Read’s defense rests

In this episode of True Crime News The Sidebar Podcast: Neama Rahmani joins host Joshua Ritter to break down the biggest cases making headlines across the nation. They discuss contentious jury deliberations in Harvey Weinstein’s retrial, Karen Read’s defense resting their case, and shocking testimony in Sean “Diddy” Combs’ federal sex-trafficking trial.

Tweet your questions for future episodes to Joshua Ritter using the hashtag #TCNSidebar.

———–
Josh Ritter
https://www.youtube.com/@CRConfidential
https://www.joshuaritter.com/
https://www.instagram.com/joshuaritteresq/

@joshuaritteresq


https://x.com/joshuaritteresq

Neama Rahmani:
https://www.instagram.com/neamarahmani/
https://x.com/NeamaRahmani
https://westcoasttriallawyers.com/our-attorneys/neama-rahmani/
———–
Subscribe to True Crime News Podcasts

APPLE PODCASTS: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-news-the-podcast/id1451999167

SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/5MCQgSSVQEPB6ME2jSy9u2?si=5f6c6df97e5c4e8d

PANDORA: https://www.pandora.com/podcast/true-crime-news-the-podcast/PC:35452?source=stitcher-sunset

GOOGLE PODCASTS: https://www.youtube.com/@mytruecrimenews/podcasts

TRUE CRIME NEWS: https://truecrimenews.com/pages/podcasts/

source

Share this post

11 thoughts on “Contentious jury deliberations break down in Weinstein’s retrial; Karen Read’s defense rests

  1. I think you hit the nail on the head when you discussed jurors and their feelings. They are not supposed to be deciding guilt or innocence based on how they feel, but they do!!! They are given very definitive instructions I'm listening to the facts and not about personally judging someone. I believe it's impossible for humans to do that!!! That is exactly why some guilty people go free, and why some innocent people are wrongfully convicted!!! I don't know how to fix the system, but I feel like something needs fixing!!!

  2. It’s very interesting how the trail streaming channels and the news commentary channels have these vastly different views on the Karen Reed Trail.

  3. Based on witness testimony Karen Reed did not run over John. The plow driver said there was no body there. The other ppl who parked out front saw nobody on the lawn. Perhaps someone else hit him, or perhaps a fight happened outside. The alberts home was never searched. Do u think if the resident was a non cop things would be way different? You bet. How do they know karen hit him? They didn't investigate anyone or anything else.

  4. I always like Attorney Naema’s takes and opinions !!!!! Even tho he’s been a prosecutor… he still brings a unique, dope perspective . Salute bruh!

Comments are closed.