Arrested For Working On Their OWN CAR! Proof They Owned It WASN’T ENOUGH!

| by | 30
Arrested For Working On Their OWN CAR! Proof They Owned It WASN’T ENOUGH!

Go to https://tryfum.com/AUDIT or scan the QR code and use code AUDIT to get your free FÜM Topper when you order your Journey Pack today.

Get The Civilian Rights Handguide here: https://a.co/d/aDvE0xL

Submit your video here: https://forms.gle/FyrRquHvYtgjUDAw7

Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit

Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit

Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellify.com

Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.

This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.

Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.

FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.

Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJ1oD957yv0

Rejects-Media’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/@Rejects-Media

Sources:

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 171.123- https://bit.ly/4jGpaj3

Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court- https://bit.ly/3nYdxIV

Graham v. Connor- https://bit.ly/3vk7YaX

Mattos v. Agarano- https://bit.ly/3HsOiwg

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 197.190- https://bit.ly/3HraW8a

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 199.280- https://bit.ly/3SBnzQA

Sykes v. City of Henderson- https://bit.ly/3ZEqV9t

Willson v. First Judicial District Court in & for County of Carson City- https://bit.ly/4mIIzml

Terry v. Ohio- https://bit.ly/2SFAnK9

Samson v. California- https://bit.ly/3HpIZ0J

United States v. Lewis- https://bit.ly/4kryyYZ

Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire- https://bit.ly/3pqWcs5

Cohen v. California- https://bit.ly/2OMM14a

source

Share this post

Recommended for You

30 thoughts on “Arrested For Working On Their OWN CAR! Proof They Owned It WASN’T ENOUGH!”

  6. @lankyeric · Edit

    love how the officer is repeatedly screaming "i didnt know that" not realizing that is the irony of why America doesn't presume guilty until proven innocent.
    bro, no one called the cops. the guy isnt smashing a window, isnt carrying a slim jim. you cant just assume people are guilty. As an officer you Cant act on shit you Dont Know.. screaming i didnt know that doesnt help your case.

  7. @ahviedinero · Edit

    Telling someone “I don’t know if it’s your car” is the same as saying “I don’t know that it ISNT your car” 😂😂😂 Just proved to everyone that he had no reason to believe it’s not their car so there should have been no investigation or detention

  8. @BoogerDad · Edit

    "I don't know that" = "everybody's getting detained until i can get someone smarter here to figure it out because I don't believe the public, they are my enemy…"

  10. @bws15 · Edit

    QI needs to be narrowed. If anything, cops need to be held to a higher standard.

    Would one expect an adult to be held to a lower standard than the kids s/he are responsible for raising?

  19. @wisewhiterabbit · Edit

    This is fucking infuriating. They cop had no right to be on private property first. No justification for tell him to get on the ground. Was told the circumstance. Didn't ask for any further clarification. Straight to the ground. Used an illegal knee to the back of the neck. Used unjustified pain compliance. Cop went 0 to straight rogue in nothing flat, then is going to file a false police report to justify his actions. When its all clearly case law against the cops very actions

  25. @realquiet3269 · Edit

    So… they are parked on the sidewalk, on an easement, partially on private property and have tires of different sizes.

    I can see why the officer stopped and saw suspicious activity.

    They were blocking the sidewalk and parked illegally… enough for a reason to speak with them and ID them

Comments are closed.