Alec Baldwin Judge Becomes Irritated with Attorney’s During Pretrial Hearing — Pretrial Hearing – Everything Law and Order Blog

As the Alec Baldwin trial is expected to kick off on Wednesday, a pretrial hearing took place on Monday where they discussed multiple filed motions including excluding witnesses, evidence, and protection with Baldwin’s role as a producer. Baldwin’s armorer, Hannah Gutierrez-Reed, was convicted of involuntary manslaughter and sentenced to 18 months in prison. A judge will rule on these issues after hearing motions from the prosecution and Baldwin’s defense. Baldwin was indicted on one count of involuntary manslaughter in January for the death of 42-year-old cinematographer Halyna Hutchins.

Watch More Coverage of Alec Baldwin’s Trial: https://bit.ly/AlecBaldwinRustTrial

Baldwin’s armorer, Hannah Gutierrez-Reed, was convicted of involuntary manslaughter and sentenced to 18 months in prison. A judge will rule on these issues after hearing motions from the prosecution and Baldwin’s defense. Baldwin was indicted on one count of involuntary manslaughter in January for the death of 42-year-old cinematographer Halyna Hutchins.

Watch ‘The Case Against Alec Baldwin’ and Get The Full Story: https://youtu.be/aE59Lmp99hI

Subscribe to Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/LawAndCrimeNetwork

#AlecBaldwin #Rust #LawAndCrime

STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on YouTubeTV: https://bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime’s Daily Newsletter: https://bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3td2Iqo

For Advertising Inquiries, Please Contact: sales@lawandcrime.com
For Licensing Inquiries, Please Contact: licensing@lawandcrime.com

LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lawandcrime/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/LawCrimeNetwork
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/lawandcrime
Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@lawandcrime

LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: https://lawandcrime.com/podcasts/

SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK YOUTUBE CHANNELS:
Main Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCz8K1occVvDTYDfFo7N5EZw
Law&Crime Shorts: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVXOqoOCYbi-iXChKAl6DTQ
Channel B: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXCLaaClAWQiTkl3pw9ZdLw
Channel C: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMV3pzWIhJGLYzoHyxBjjNw

source

26 thoughts on “Alec Baldwin Judge Becomes Irritated with Attorney’s During Pretrial Hearing — Pretrial Hearing”
  1. Is Kari Morrissey the sister of Elaine, the lawyer of Amber, from Johny Deep trial, or is she just an avid Trump suporter, and hates Baldwin for hes roles as Trump? 😄😄🤣🤣😂😂

  2. I’m not commenting on the video. Didn’t watch, no interest. I just want to urge the channel owner to edit the apostrophe out of the title. It’s “attorneys” plural, not “attorney’s” possessive. You’re not taking about a thing that belonged to one of the attorneys. See there? See how I used the plural because the judge was angry with more than one attorney? For the love of holy grammar, please freaking fix it.

  3. I’ve never heard about a serious criminal case being dropped by a judge because of one small error of the state.
    They looks incredibly corrupt to me.

  4. Interesting that the judge denied evidence as a producer. I saw Boeing CEO getting grilled by the US senate. Blaming him for the trouble of the compan.

  5. If I was in the jury, I would find him guilty. If you are handling a firearm, regardless if it was not loaded, I would not point it at anybody. I would ask the defendant, would you point an unloaded gun at your family or yourself?

  6. WELL STAND CORRECTED >>> THE THE DIRECTOR AND DIRECTING STAFF AND THE SCRIPT PERSON WOULD TELL THE ACTOR "WHAT TO DO" >>> THANKS FOR SHARING ACTOR PERSON " BUT MY BOSS >>> THE PRODUCER "" WANTS IT THIS WAY">> THE PRODUCER IS BALDWIN ….

  7. THE REASON ALEC B ACTED THE WAY HE DID WAS THE FACT THAT WHILE ACTING WENT INTO BEING PRODUCER IN ONE SENTENCED AND THE "ACTOR " ON THE NEXT SENTENCED AND EVERYONE HAD TO LISTEN TO THE BOSS! IF HE WERE JUST THE >>>"ACTOR"<<<< THE DIRECTOR OR THE STAFF OR THE CARMERA OR LIGHTING PERSON WOULD HAVE EQUAL STANDING AND WOULD DIFFER AND OR BRING THEIR WHAT EVER TO WHO >>>>THE PRODUCER >>> WHO IS STANDING RIGHT THERE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! JUDGE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  8. In New Mexico law involuntary manslaughter requires acting in a reckless manner, proving that the death was an accident and that Alex Baldwin acted as he was supposed to be acting, and not recklessly, would exonerate him. That's why they keep pushing for witnesses to recognize it was an accident. The other charge, negligent use of a firearm, requires the defendant to have used the firearm with negligence. Negligence is defined by "omitting to do something which a reasonable man, guided by those considerations which ordinarily regulate the conduct of human affairs, would do, or doing something which a prudent and reasonable man would not do." That is why they're trying to prove that he didn't act negligently because a) It was a "cold" gun, b) He was adhering to set procedure in which two people would've reviewed the gun before handling it to him. Prosecutors are trying to suggest he acted negligently because he didn't ask about the gun once it was handled it to him. But, based on the facts, he should've been able to reasonably assume the gun didn't pose a threat and that he could handle it as his character would've handled it. Therefore, he didn't act negligently. I would be surprised if he's found guilty.

  9. Executive producer provides funds to a film and receives a share of profits. It’s offered to many actors and doesn’t mean they have any responsibility other than that. Not the same as a producer. Baldwin was in the midst of being directed when the gun went off. He was being told where to put his hands and fingers by the cinematographer and the director.

  10. I hope Mr. Baldwin is found innocent at the conclusion of the trial. This is BS. No more common sense just charge everyone for everything?

  11. Did he point gun at people? Yes.

    Is it ever ok to point gun at a person?
    No.

    Is there footage of him pointing gun at people?
    Yes.

    Were there misfires on set prior to this tragic incident?
    Yes.

    Could this incident have been prevented?
    Yes.

  12. As a child, I learned gun safety. If handed a gun in a safe manner, I always check it myself to ensure it is not loaded. If you don't check it, assume the gun is always loaded and treat it and others with respect. One should NEVER point a gun at someone else whether it is loaded or unloaded. That's only common sense. Alec Baldwin failed on all gun safety rules. He is responsible for the murder of an innocent individual regardless of whether the gun handed to him was loaded or not. He had the responsibility to check the weapon for himself. To point the finger at others for safety violations is irresponsible.

  13. As actor PLUS producer role gives a clearer picture of the lawful list of responsibilities. To say he was only acting as an actor brings his charges down to a less severe level of manslaughter.

Comments are closed.