They just secured an informant | Temple Terrace police driver handcuffed

Temple Terrace police department had a traffic stop with a white Mitsubishi. Upon my arrival I noticed that the three officers were searching the vehicle.

They can’t out run the scooter. –https://amzn.to/2QToBXP

My scooter: https://amzn.to/2T3pfVe

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/JMAudits
Paypal: paypal.me/JMAudits
Gofundme: https://www.gofundme.com/f/JamesMadisonAudits
—————Equipment: —————
Body Camera: https://amzn.to/2Hs5bWa
Gimbal: https://amzn.to/2NuQWU7
Cheaper Gimbal: https://amzn.to/2NuQWU7
Knoxville Sunglasses: https://amzn.to/30trQrV
Mavic 2 Pro Drone (Current) https://amzn.to/2Hog37r
Mavic Pro (filmed this video) https://amzn.to/2L7j5h8
Mavic Battery https://amzn.to/2HgVt8X
Video Cameras: https://amzn.to/2HmDf5I
Audio: https://amzn.to/2L7wRjR (Yes for real) This video may not have utilized them
Wind Muff: https://amzn.to/31WouP5
https://amzn.to/2QToBXP

By the time that I could get up to the car they only had the driver handcuffed and in the placed Him in the backseat of patrol car. One of the undercover deputies were police officers vent on handcuffed him and put him in the black Chevy Malibu where it looks like they are going over statement forms. Typically in a police situation like this what you’re doing securing an informant instead of charging him or her with a crime your van with a condition of assistance going to either destroy and no prosecute the evidence or write a ticket for the offense instead of take him to jail

** (Disclaimer: This video content is intended for educational and informational purposes only) **

Author: phillynews215

HOSTING BY PHILLYFINESTSERVERSTAT | ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS. POST QUESTION OR INQUIRIES SEND ME AN EMAIL TO PHILLYNEWSNOW215@GMAIL.COM (www.phillynewsnow.com)

16 thoughts on “They just secured an informant | Temple Terrace police driver handcuffed

  1. You would think that would be against the FOIA act, and the 1st amendment them keeping the public from hearing their radio chatter

Comments are closed.