Posted in Cop Watch

LAPD BLOCKS SB 1421! the RIGHT TO KNOW! DENIED BY LAPD

   05/06/2021  32 Comments on LAPD BLOCKS SB 1421! the RIGHT TO KNOW! DENIED BY LAPD

My request and LAPD response:

https://lacity.nextrequest.com/requests/19-91

ACLU link for template to write request:

https://www.aclusocal.org/en/know-your-rights/access-ca-police-records

LAPD
July 10, 2005 incident report:
http://www.lapdonline.org/search_results/content_basic_view/33954

Please thumbs up, share and subscribe

Skirts on the Beat with LaurasharkCW & Ida Foxy queen (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCxwr76XajtWE7WZarFawaUA), the first and only female cop watch team

** (Disclaimer: This video content is intended for educational and informational purposes only) **

Author: phillynews215

HOSTING BY PHILLYFINESTSERVERSTAT | ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS. POST QUESTION OR INQUIRIES SEND ME AN EMAIL TO PHILLYNEWSNOW215@GMAIL.COM (www.phillynewsnow.com)
Website Twitter

32 thoughts on “LAPD BLOCKS SB 1421! the RIGHT TO KNOW! DENIED BY LAPD”

  4. Yes, a lot of BS. Everytime you think you have won something the government comes up with another bill to block you of what you want to do. This is what happens to black people when they try to buy homes, it's called redlining and it suck like most things in America.

  12. @Laura Shark CW, I love how law enforcement officers say, "We pay taxes too." The hilarious part is, the only way they are able to pay their taxes is because of the tax dollars/money we pay them with. Law enforcement officers are just recycling our tax dollars/money we pay them with inorder to pay their taxes. Lmmfao 😂….

  14. You ought to do at least 2 more requests, following the same procedure as before, and see if they are all denied. If they deny all, or just one more, it would establish a pattern of corruption that they don't want to either follow the law; or just don't like you. Just a friendly suggestion; again, I'm not an attorney.

  15. I mean, the law OBVIOUSLY means any fucking record… not just records that occur after 1st January 2019. Give me a fucking break…

  17. so lets me see if I got this right.. they get to use there computer to pull up our info n use that personally…. but we get a law passed now they are saying they are above public rights to know…. am I missing something here or am I just stupid … gov office and police are above the law and the courts are there to protect them not us … am I wrong again… Andy died and Barney took over…. 🙁

  21. 🖕🏾🖕🏾🖕🏾🖕🏾🖕🏾🖕🏾🖕🏾🖕🏾🖕🏾🖕🏾🖕🏾 the 🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷. Stay safe.

  22. Ok… So I did a little research on this and had a few great chuckles.

    In the emergency stay, "[t]he LAPPL’s whole argument seems to be that officers have made CRUCIAL CAREER DECISIONS relying on the privacy of the records, and that therefore it would be manifestly unfair to publish them now." Emphasis Added.

    I had to laugh at this because it is so ridiculous an argument. Why? Because SB1421 only requires the release of officers wrong doing.

    "(A) A record relating to the report, investigation, or findings of any of the following:

    (i) An incident involving the discharge of a firearm at a person by a peace officer or custodial officer.

    (ii) An incident in which the use of force by a peace officer or custodial officer against a person resulted in death, or in great bodily injury.

    (B) (i) Any record relating to an incident in which a sustained finding was made by any law enforcement agency or oversight agency that a peace officer or custodial officer engaged in sexual assault involving a member of the public.

    (ii) As used in this subparagraph, “sexual assault” means the commission or attempted initiation of a sexual act with a member of the public by means of force, threat, coercion, extortion, offer of leniency or other official favor, or under the color of authority. For purposes of this definition, the propositioning for or commission of any sexual act while on duty is considered a sexual assault."

    So the LAPPL'S argument is, in my opinion, that if the peace office would have thought that the records would be released, the peace officers would not have made the career decision to commit sexual assault, discharging their firearm at a citizen, or killing a citizen and more. 🤯🤯🤯

    You just can't make this s#$@ up!

  23. It’s so funny how many time the cops get told by the courts to do something because it’s the law! We make 1 mistake and we get issued a warrant for our arrest and get put in a cage within hours. They just need told 86 times to “please start following the law, or else we will do nothing to you.” Funny thing is that they think they are sneaky and the public’s is clueless to the double standard.

  28. It just means they have something to hide. Just like how they act in a police officer shooting…they block all access to corporate and freelance media. It's because of you Laura and Dan and people like you that the system needs to change. Keep up the good fight. Love your vids.

  29. When you think you've found the answers, that's when the questions change. Nothing shocks me anymore, I hope you stay on top of this. Thank you Ms. Laura for bringing accountability one video at a time 🦈🦈🦈🦈🦈🦈🦈🦈🦈🦈🦈🦈🦈🦈🦈🦈🦈🦈🦈🦈

  30. Citizens should do the same when a new state statute goes into effect. File for an injunction and force it to be held up in state court, and eventually federal court. 9th Circuit court of appeals currently has an estimated 24 month run time on 3 judge panel case rulings. En banc (full court) opinions could exceed 5 years.

Comments are closed.