Posted in Cop Watch

Eric Brandt Sentencing Full Unedited Uncut Version

   05/07/2021  43 Comments on Eric Brandt Sentencing Full Unedited Uncut Version

James Freeman does first amendment audits, cop watching, cop blocking, and more. Since Live PD and Cops was cancelled, James Freeman does LIVE STREAMING COP WATCHES. It’s like Live PD, except actually live, and without the “cops can do no wrong” bias.

** (Disclaimer: This video content is intended for educational and informational purposes only) **

Author: phillynews215

HOSTING BY PHILLYFINESTSERVERSTAT | ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS. POST QUESTION OR INQUIRIES SEND ME AN EMAIL TO PHILLYNEWSNOW215@GMAIL.COM (www.phillynewsnow.com)
Website Twitter

43 thoughts on “Eric Brandt Sentencing Full Unedited Uncut Version”

  5. Eric Brandt’s story is about a mentally disturbed man than should have been treated medically. Too often mentally Ill and chemically depended people are treated as criminals rather than patients.

  7. This judge calls himself a libertarian, right. Passing a 12yr sentence, then gets to retire without a backward glance. 12yrs for hurty words? Restrictions on what he can do? He certainly didn't show much restriction with those years. I can't help wonder, if he had threatened homeless people, would the sentence be so severe? I doubt it, you can't go against the establishment of judicial pricks.

  10. And that judge cant just say I am not going to listen because I dont know their Names?, WTF, there is a 4th Admendment Correct??????????????????????

  11. That one Chick Said, "Words Don't Hurt", Why The Fuck did He get 12 Fucking Years?!!!!!!!!!!!! And if some one wishes something on someone else?, and some one else does it ?, that doesnt make that person responsable for what that per4son DOES!!! WTF!!!!!!!

  12. how the hell does this servant (judge) have the right to tell his masters ( we the people) that we can or can not have cameras or audio record OUR COURT ROOM!!?? Colorado is so corrupt it should be called Corruptorado!!

  13. This is quite a exaggeration coming from people that supposed to have authority I watched every video and every phone call Eric Brandt made oh yes it was bad but I foresee no threats pretty much they were out to get them yeah he has a mouth but I don't consider him threats sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never harm me apparently their daddy didn't teach him that have a nice day

  15. I think that by this streaming on YT, really lit a fire under the judges ass to spit in all of Eric’s supporters face and “have the last laugh”! Which made the judge punish Eric to the max which is so messed up cuz the law does NOT give Judges the right to punish/sentence someone based on emotion/feelings!!!!

  16. That judge didn’t hear two words any of Eric’s people said.. he had it in his head from the jump that he was gonna Punish Eric with the maximum amount of punishment allowed!!!

  22. Cops do not work for the citizens they work for satans asshole, "government & big corporations" to create revenue. Big Money in doing so they are allowed to rape take and murder the public. There's no such thing as a good cop

  23. The sentence was way too much. They screwed him over. This judge is like this brings me no joy. It might not but this isn't justice over words. It just isn't. 😡

    Thanks James.

  24. Of course these are the same " public officials" that look the other way while vaccine murders are taking place across the country and world. The black judge was a drama queen grandstanding. He should stand up for black ppl if he feels so passionate. He should check out MAAFA 21 on youtube. It talks about (among other things) how abortion clinics ere set up in black communities to target minorities. These people pretend not to know about Agenda 21, the depopulation agenda. Their hypocrisy is obvious and stark…

    However, as I said, a freedom fighter is of little use in jail. Given their corruption, Eric should have known what they're capable of. Not surprised there are multiple Karens w/ sand in their vag involved in this. That one lady was talking about telling her husband about threats. Her husband goes home to the threat of her divorce raping him on a whim. Bet she has no issue with that bit of unfairness. She could take their children any time she gets a hair across her ass..

  25. I have mixed opinions about Brandt but I definitely object to all judges who won’t allow court proceedings from being recorded and distributed. We need 100% Transparency. It gives us confidence in the system which is crucial.

  27. My heart dropped for Eric when they gave him 12 years. He was a hero and this is another example the court system hates real patriots. Because they want to keep this fake sense of that they are patriots when they're making over 100k a year to fill the judge position. There needs to be a protest for Eric that was just wrong

  28. I cannot even watch this! They let Pedophiles walk all the time…but put a good man like Eric in prison for 12 years for some bs words?!

  31. Schaefer Cox is serving 28 years for words he DIDN’T say!! They can lock up anyone they want to…period.

  34. You can clearly tell he is down his a few days left of working as a judge. Doesn't give a shit. Probably why he got the case.

  35. again, superceeding fairness, via a more narrow ( focus ) on the UNLAWFULLNESS ( the illegaility ) of this CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY; My government [ employees ] our Senators, House of represatives, ( not congress, thas an imaginary group ) [doesn't exist, best i can determine } tis only a HIDEOUT [ where they ] our actual empjoyees [ CONCEAL THEIR IDENTITIES, again, best i can tell ] ( why) CAUSE i only have limited time n other intelellect, interest ectera [ in wade'ing thru thier oh so many faked arifically created MISNOMERS thus COMPLEXITIES ; But also that run on sentence ( our Legistlators , law makers ) are nearer to our (2) groups of PRIMARIY"ally addressable [ DISTENCT ] yeah i can in fact spl distinct CROOKS [ our SENATORS n omg tis a long one House of REPRESENATIVES ] n dunno where ASSEMBLYMEN fits but [ everrything EITHER has a LAWFUL LEGITIMATE purpose or it is equivalent to [ in science ] automotive manufacturing [ anywhre ] inclusion of any unnecessary COMPLEXITTY omg [ tis would be equated with premeditated MURDER [; This last part due to the need for SAFETY [ everywhere ] in all [ SCIENCE ] not just autos or vechicles [ is in FACT easily logically provable, any where [ any ] complexity exist's it [ censord ] [ BETTOR ] ( yes, misspelled ) have some [ censored ] LEGITIMATE PURPOSE or it's END OF GAME [ check mate ] because

    the simplicity i created in the paragraph [ ABOVE ] does in fact , pepare the court for what follows;

    Our [ censords ] do in fact have at least one egregious display of the UNLAWFULLNESS ( ie FILIBUSTER ) and tis so blantent of a CRIME, so openenly HIDDEN IN PLAIN sight, with such long history of these CRIMINALITY ( our yeah [ whatever ] names they r ? ) i've already explained they are in FACT NOT CONGRESSMEN ( that's a term oour MATT GAETZ ) HIDES behind ( for 2 reasons ) [ i could avoid digression , but life ] omg, its simple {1} its cool, has more sex or marketable saleability than calling himself what he in fact is acccredited as in fact being his title n thus he is in fact also HIDING his ( item 2 ) he is hiding his IDENITY as a member of the house, or reps , thus he in fact is a REPRESENTATIVE, or more corrctly we citizens to determine [ the precise locaton ] whre his or rather which identifes his [ emplyoee ] status is he MG is a menber omg i can't even forumulae the simplicity but he's in fact NOT a congressman [ that's not an [ employee ] [ classification ] tis only a single duty area so the reality is [ i must concreate the offical category ] tis twisted wording ( omg ) we have a HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES so we nver in fact hear the compound wrd HOUSE REPRESENTATIVE? maybe we do , but bassically, best i can determine we have [ senators, + house represnatives ] possbly assemblymen as a 3rd ( but i susppect ) legislator, lawmaker, commitee member {ECTERA} is [ if it's UNNECESSARY ] COMPLEXITY, n i [ corral ] it as such, meaning if in fact assemblymen (omg) litterally is an additional real world [ employee ] category , that ones EXEMPT, but anyone using the wrds , technially [ additional ] wrds congressmen [ to define some additional simplicity ] whre thiese ppl filling these [ employee ] positions do NOT in fact get to [ create ] [ all these distinctions ] ( simply cause they can ) [ simply due to the existing complexities of the ] additional items, a meeting, which is what i beleve the wrd congress might be a meeting of our House of Represtatives [ which HOR is not the singular [ job description ] so in fact it is the ( odd, strange sounding ( House Represative ), n i could be mistaken ( cause MG)'s only (1) crook so i only looked it up ONCE, then accepted it without futher verifying his [ employee , status ]

    becaue in fact is said he was a member of the house of representatives, n tho he likes to think of himself as the more marketable and sexier name [ CONGRESSMAN ] he's not a congressman EVER, iF MY understanding of all these wrds are correct [ n givin ] the fact [ this is a tiny [ area of the vastness ] of all the additional [ moving parts ] of our govt [ no one would ] individually, without a huge staff, be able to disect [ the very simple ] [ separate parts, yes, all this [ single BIT ] of data is in fact simple, but i got 99 other crimes [ same as any ] smh; THE PROBLEM IS,

    none of what i've said thus far is the single crime [ filibuster ] ( i described in the intro paragrah, top of this ) [ single ] note, all the rest of the v,n CRIMES r in fact crimes, soon as i corral each wrd into the appropriate bins n examine where, when, why, HOW, omg,ect; BUT I CAN'T because i MUST FOCUS ( the crime of interest is ) anyone stujpid enough to belivie i would allow any AUTO MECHANIC to comprimise the SAFETY OF AN automotive vechicle [ while he filiabuster ] NO, that would in fact be criminal indictment[1] if not using a zero based array numbering, even my [ unnecessary [ clarification just now the difference tween 0 and 1 ] enumerating systems, was AT LEAST legitimate , not necesary BUT the reality is

    i WILL NOT cause tis EVEN MORE CRIMINAL, [ to extend the CRIME from ] filibuster , to all it's family, so far i have filibustering, filibustered, filibustering ectera, idunno if there's more, i knew i had at least on more crime, no i do not ever desire to add or count this insanity as separate items [ tis only (1) crime ] the wrd FILIBUSTER n thas imo [ the necessity ] never include the various, numverous [ but very specific ] additoinal forms our grammer , or the locton within the noun verb ectera requires it cause these r in FACT CRIMINALS, our police whould throw them to the ground, some obvious height, tactical advantage, NO I AM NOT threatening to throw anyone ( not our senators, not our HOUSE REPRESENTATIVES ) btw if anyone can SIMPLYF , especailly correct all my errors, ( directly via explaing ) thas helpuful, even if u could yes if its lawful to cut n paste it here or somewhre esle we coould have dialogs on these times, tht's imo helpful but what really dogs my [ ability to stay on point ] someone links to an external [ long series of explanations ] tis USELESS, i obvously dislike that from my past experiences, yes it's a valid way to study thus leaern many things but i myself have in fact googled, and in fact theirs so much data, it takes time, for instance at this moment i could in fact

    make real [ incremental ] progress by lookingfor the defintion of congress [ prolly ] a very specific meeting of [ senators, house representatives ] thus ( if my speculation ) [ in that single, tiny n yes easily resolvable ] [ single, simplicity ] is true, then ( nxt msg )

  36. Well I guess being offended by words is a crime now. 1st Amendment is done. The Communists have won. The Chinese have won.

  38. President Biden, sir as of this moment i am notifying u ( personally ) [ Censored Censored ] of my intent to sue our United States [ government ] for (3) times the net SUM of all assets currently owned by and or in the possession of our United States Government sir;

    Lawrence Wilson Foy dob 2.10.1954 Chateauroux France [ signature valid in any court ] [ signed LWF ] 4.30.2021 in Terlingua Tx;

Comments are closed.