Why Do Politicians LOVE Guns So Much?

#cops #politicians #currentevents

One thing you can be sure of is that when a politician wants to reduce the number of boomsticks out there, it will NEVER be to reduce the ones in the rooms THEY are in. In this video I discuss the hypocrisy and impracticality of the idea that the solution to evil is getting rid of the instrument of it. It makes no sense. What DOES make sense is that politicians view THEIR lives as more important than we the people and our children. Joe Biden is a shining example of how politics thinks that more gun laws are the solution to evil people doing evil things and only hamstringing law abiding citizens.

You won’t hear reality on MSNBC or any MSM news outlets but hopefully the truth wins out over time on this and so many other issues that are important.

MY SITE: http://www.mikethecop.tv
SHOP: http://www.relentlessdefender.com/mtc
PODCAST: http://www.failuretostop.com
10-7 Project: http://www.ten7project.com

** (Disclaimer: This video content is intended for educational and informational purposes only) **

Author: rafael.nieves


29 thoughts on “Why Do Politicians LOVE Guns So Much?

  1. Not sure why you do not understand or ignore the fact that an 18yr old should not be allowed to purchase an AR-15. It is just common sense that for someone to own a gun he should go through a background check and/or psych tests. I mean cmmon we all agree that an 18yr is not mature enough to have a beer, a pack of cigarretes why trust them with a AR-15. Is not taking away weapons, is being mor strict.

  2. I know they're following orders but how the you think these armed protectors feel about possibly risking their lives protecting someone that's running their country into the ground?

  3. democratic communist leftist marxists see a tragedy with a gun as an opportunity to seize control. It has absolutely nothing about the well being of people. Its beyomd foolish to assume any form of legislation or bans or whatever could ever even remotely prevent or thwart a massacre of a mentally ill person. They only thing that can stop a bad person with a gun is a good person with a gun. Armed citizenry would be my suggestion. Its like attacking the silverware industry for people being obese

  4. You can kill someone with a baseball bat or a car, but they're not trying to ban you from driving to the ballgame.
    A gun is a tool, it's up to the end user on how to use the tool. Guns aren't the actual problem, it's the people that have ill intentions. It's a big mess that needs attention, but don't punish the many for the actions of a few.
    Edit. So what kind of gun did this sicko actually use?

  5. The 2nd wasn't written to protect deer. It was for we the people. However, we are so divided and distracted as a country no one has time or cares enough until something like this happens. Then they want a lazy solution. This is a multifaceted problem. Punishing law abiding citizens is never an acceptable solution.

  6. 2016. A man in France killed more than 80 people with a moving truck. France has very restrictive firearms laws. This has nothing to do with guns or the appropriate age for access to guns. You can't child-proof the planet Luis. People do bad things. That is a fact of life that will never go away. At some point, if you are intelligent enough, you will weigh the difference between the illusion of safety and liberty and will come to the correct answer.

  7. Man you have such a warped mind. Politicians are not more important just sadly they are a huge target for crazy nutters with guns. Seriously

  8. They want law abiding citizens to give up our guns. So if they give up all the security and private bodyguards protecting their pie holes,maybe we'll think about it! One other thought when 911 happened did we blame the airplanes and scream to ban them?

  9. Because:
    Amendment I 

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

    Amendment II 

    A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

    Amendment III

    No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

    Amendment IV

    The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

    Amendment V

    No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

    Amendment VI 

    In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.

    Amendment VII

    In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

    Amendment VIII 

    Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

    Amendment IX 

    The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

    Amendment X 

    The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

  10. Tough topic. For the record, I am for the second amendment but something needs to be done about these “video game” type killings. I’m not smart enough to have a solution but I care enough to ask. We (Americans) need to figure it out. Thx Mike

  11. Joe Brandon and Barry O, they smuggled guns to the narco terrorists who killed hundreds, perhaps thousands of innocent Mexicans, including children…

  12. Americans need to be more involved with their children's Schools, Not the State.
    Homeschooling and Community based schooling is more important than ever before, with State Indoctrination and 'Social Grooming" of children..

    Think about what has to be happening in these schools to make kids to Blitzkrieg their classmates…

    Get your kids OUT of these schools.

  13. We will never know the number of lives saves nor freedoms protected due to 2A. Don't ever tell me I should trust my government for the greater good! The only freedoms worth protecting are individual ones, else we are talking slaves and masters.

    262,000,000, thats 262 million people killed by various governments during the 20th century. Not in battle, executed or purposefully starved to death. And the gut reaction of some is to disarm or let the government here confiscate private weaponry. 262 million people, mostly unarmed who died without a fighting chance. From a purely mathematical view it is clear the problem has been and remains too few guns not too many, from a practical view it only makes sense. From the human perspective, those calling for gun control are either would be tyrants, agents of the state or the Judas goats of humanity.
    R. Hamilton 2018

  14. In the Constitution that says the second amendment will not be infringed on before all you left to start putting up funny faces look up the word and fringed on

  15. Highly intelligent & insightful conversation, Mike,- as usual. WHEN will politicos recognize thar We the People deserve the same level of personal security they enjoy.

Comments are closed.