Exclusive Interview: Calvin Harris acquitted after 4 trials (Pt 4) – Crime Watch Daily

Exclusive Interview: Calvin Harris acquitted after 4 trials (Pt 4) – Crime Watch Daily

Cal Harris’s lawyers did some digging and they believed they found two other potential suspects. Today — for the very first time — one of those men is breaking his silence to #CrimeWatchDaily.

Full story: http://crimewatchdaily.com/2016/09/27/special-investigation-calvin-harris-acquitted-after-4-murder-trials-in-death-of-wife/

source

Share this post

32 thoughts on “Exclusive Interview: Calvin Harris acquitted after 4 trials (Pt 4) – Crime Watch Daily

  1. A real loser. Let the mother of his 4 kids down by having an affair, threatened her with a shotgun, told her he could make her disappear, her blood found in the house, cut her money off, then the idiot was upset or surprised she wanted a divorce ? A typical abusive sociopath who also thought everything was “his”, as if his wife was an employee he could dismiss with nothing, he saw everything as “his”. Sickening.
    Oh but the kids love him. 🤢🤮. Zero loyalty to their mother.

  2. The lazy cops find it hard to go past husband/bf because of the statistical probability. In this case the victim was allegedly involved with several men so there were many possibilities as well as the potential neighbours/strangers

  3. The kids reason are dumb who wouldn’t want to do everything the can to stay out of jail shhhhiiit I’d do everything I can because no one wants to go to prison

  4. sorry but you guys would be damn mad too if you were accused of a crime, the police officers daughter was working your case after you fired her dad, there is no evidence, THERE IS NO EVIDENCE. perhaps he DID DO IT, you need to be able to prove without a reasonable doubt. the law goes after who they want to…how is there no evidence found on a 40+ acre property? there are people walking free and there was so much circumstantial evidence against them. its scary that you can be jailed without evidence….if he did it then he did it but it must 100% be proven.

  5. I don't want to judge anyone there's two sides to this story one can't give it, and then there's the truth so much corruption with the police that it's hard to believe them too, I can only say he had so much time to get rid of any evidence hours in fact then call the nanny to get the kids ready then wait for the nanny to find the car he lives far out no one would know what he was up to and he kids aren't going to speak bad about their father when they need somewhere to live etc only God knows the truth and Michelle godbless her soul

  6. Cal you know who murdered her. You already admitted it. You are a murderer. Stewart wasn't on trial Crime Watch daily , CAL HARRIS WAS and was convicted twice. Clearly Cal killed Michele the only person on the planet who had anything to do with her murder. Kevin Tubbs is the most not credible witness in history.

  7. If Cal Harris made the same admissions about his friends burning bloody clothing then the people who think he is guilty would be all over that very unusual statement. Something is not right there. It is not the first time the statement was brought up years ago, and Stacy admits to it on camera, but yet no answers still, as to the unusual circumstance. "yeah buddy, you and your girlfriend can burn your blood soaked clothing in my burn pit and barrel, no problem. Seriously, why did they not take care of their clothes at their own place? What was it there for? If your going to skin a deer, I suppose you would wear clothing just for that purpose like must hunters do? If it had nothing to do with Michele, then the statement needs to be cleared up, why the big secret about where the blood came from? This statement itself is a bombshell, and has been for years. Can you imagine a friend showing up with his girlfriend both covered in blood, then wanting to burn their clothes in your yard? If the clothes are not evidence to a crime, why not just try to wash them or throw them in a garbage bag? I also think that the statement is only partially true, a diversion of sorts, there is alot more to that statement that we have no answers for.

  8. Stewart admits his 2 friends show up to his house in bloody clothing which was burned afterwards in his own yard, Now, if that is not unusual, C'mon, how many of us can say that about our friends, showing up at your house covered in blood and allowing them to burn them in your yard? Something is very strange there.

  9. anyone else feel uncomfortable with how easily this guy is describing these crimes? Like he made a point to talk about her bag of jewelry being worth $15,000 as if thats enough to live on. This guy is so fucking guilty. Another thing I have noticed so far; look at his eyes. First in the old pictures when he's happy and smiling with the wife and kids, and then look at his eyes in this interview. There is a noticeable change. His eyes are creepy. I absolutely believe this man has taken another person's life.
    I feel terrible for his children. One day they'll come to understand their father on the level their Mother did. What they'll see they won't like.

  10. I feel sorry for my husband if anything ever happens to me (which he would never be involved in), because I can just hear some cop saying, "The husband is not acting appropriately to his wife's death."

Comments are closed.