Jefferson Parish Sheriffs Department In Louisiana is caught throwing a woman around by her hair. They claim that the video was selectively edited. I assumed this meant context was removed, so I want the Sheriffs department to explain what context would make the behavior of their deputy acceptable.
James Freeman
#shorts

** (Disclaimer: This video content is intended for educational and informational purposes only) **

26 thoughts on “Under What Context Would This Be Okay?”
  1. The only kind of good cop is a dead cop. For even the alleged good cops turn a blind eye to corrupt cops therefore making them all corrupt. There is no such thing as a good cop..

  2. My wishes for this cop!! Hope he doesn’t make it to his next birthday !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 😡😡😡😡😡😡🤬🤬🤬🤬

  3. The wrong cops are quiting the force cause of Brandon.. LET'S GO BRANDON!! LET'S GO BRANDON!!

  4. The idea of selectively editing of the video clip is no doubt true.. a portion of the video was edited, that is the part being shown is apart from any other portion of the video.. what it does not mean is that the video you are seeing is modified.. what you are seeing is exactly what took place.. and no context was taken out of this clip at all.. you see the clip, what happened in the clip is exactly what happened and no context of this clip was removed.. regardless of what else may have happened prior to this or after this, this clip is not modified at all, is not actually edited to show the officer doing something he actually did not do.. he did exactly what this clip shows.. he is a thug, and asshole and a piece of shit.. and he and his fellow officers know this, and now so does the rest of the world..

  5. If there was body cam footage the department wouldn't have to worry about an "edited" video. They could be transparent because there certainly is a context in which this behavior is approved.

  6. Good question James. I hope that you don’t give up trying to call. The bootlicker type phone call that you do should be eye opening if you get the right moron on the line.

  7. To answer your question: Perhaps she refused to suck it? Perhaps she refused to bend over? Perhaps she had a wig and it was attacking her and he was trying to save her? (never though of that did you) Maybe just maybe he realized she was possessed by the devil and he was ordering it out of her.

  8. In answer to your question, this would be okay in the context of a consensual BDSM agreement. That's a big part of the problem – sadists not finding the proper outlet and masochist for their need to bleed. Maybe we should start a BDSM dating site for cops!

  9. MOST DON'T UNDERSTAND HOW MUCH HOLLYWOOD HAS TO DO WITH THIS.
    EXAMPLE AS A KID I NOTICED THAT ON DRAGNET THEY WOULD TALK ABOUT THE POLICE THAT SACRIFICE SO MUCH ONLY TO HAVE SOME FANCY LAWYER GET THEM OFF. I HEARD COP SAY WE NEED TO START SHOOTING THESE PUNKS. BASED ON DRAGNET.
    WE GOT BARNEY'S THINKING THEY ARE DIRTY HARRY.

  10. Can't you see he was in fear for his life and that he was just trying to remove the gun she had pointing at him in her hair(it's an old trick used way back in the day). Luckily he was able to undo her weave and grab hold of the gun saving himself serious injury. Hell we all know what a good blow wave or worse still hair curlers can do, leave you scarred for life not to mention all the trauma the officers love ones go through. I mean there are somethings wearing a bullet proof can't protect you from. AND NO IT'S NOT COMMON SENSE IT'S NO SENSE AT ALL. TOTALLY MINDLESS AND SENSELESS BEATING OF A WOMAN A FRACTION OF HIS SIZE WHAT A MAN, HOPE HE'S NOT MARRIED AND HAS KIDS.

  11. lawyers I respect because that profession actually requires some intelligence. But what does it take to be a cop lol 0 intelligence. You don’t even have to know the laws you supposedly enforce 😂

  12. This is how the department serves and protects its citizens. Protect the officers qualified immunity and serve the citizen a ass whooping.

Comments are closed.