‘A Murder in the Park’: Was Exonerated Death Row Inmate Guilty? – Pt. 2 – Crime Watch Daily

‘A Murder in the Park’: Was Exonerated Death Row Inmate Guilty? – Pt. 2 – Crime Watch Daily

It starts with a gruesome killing in South Side, Chicago – two people gunned down in cold blood. Witnesses point the finger at the same man. But who is actually guilty of the crime?

Check your local listings at CrimeWatchDaily.com.

source

Share this post

46 thoughts on “‘A Murder in the Park’: Was Exonerated Death Row Inmate Guilty? – Pt. 2 – Crime Watch Daily

  1. What kills me is these innocent people are actually being found guilty of crimes they did not commit. How is that possible? The justice system needs to change. Makes people not trust the justice system…which should be flawless and close to perfect.

  2. This is the same thing that is happening right now in the Rodney Reed case. Look into it. The innocence project is up to its old tricks and trying to get a guilty man off death row.

  3. There are a hundred exceptions to the double jeopardy rule. One of them is fact – if it is determined that the facts of the trial is found out to be false, you absolutely can re-try. So I am confused as to why Anthony Porter wasnt put back in prison. Also – the interview of Story's "confession" is played on the news, and Porter is released…without the DA investigating anything? I cant think of another case where a criminal is released based off a news report and no involvement from the DA.

  4. This shit is so wack. someone that actually didnt kill anyone wouldnt lie and say they killed someone. doesnt make any sense at all. why would an innocent person admit something that they didnt do? thats because they arent actually innocent duh

  5. I disagree with some of this. The students were not 100% innocent fawns. Watch the documentary, in their transcripts they flat out lied sometimes, or ignored warnings from the detectives such as "That structure wasn't there at that time" or "That is NOT where the crime took place" They tailored their case to fit their narrative.

  6. 7:27 How disgusting. David Protess built his career on freeing innocent people because they were coerced into confessing. Then he says "Well, if the guy falsely confessed why didnt he say anything?" The hypocrisy is so think, one could choke on it.

  7. That entire Northwestern team needs to be put in prison themselves. Beware of a killer crying about his innocence. Alastory Simon lost 15 years of his life because fools fell for the claims of a guilty man. Absolutely disgusting.

  8. so, the killer is free on the fact they cant try him on a double jepordy …they cant try you twice for the same crime. what a major fuck up

  9. Its really crazy on who we allow to protect and run our country. This justice system is fucked and everything within it will be continuously exposed. There are so many cases where people who Actually expose these type of people end up dead or imprisoned. I bet not too many people heard of the Gary Webb case. Gary Webb was someone exposed the CIA, and saying how they were involved into putting drugs like cocaine into different regions of the world. He was found shot and they ruled it as a suicide, BUT he supposedly shot himself 2 times in the head. This justice system is so corrupt.

  10. People run with everything. 😂😂 I bet you both sides full of shit and the truth lies in the middle. Fuck the prosecutors

    Regardless it was their job to investigate the second dude but let’s just forget that. Man they are just as guilty. They the ones locked him up

  11. As fucked up as it is people will still fall for tricks like these every time, just look at the Cynthia Brown case, she was set free because people allowed the media to twist up the facts of the story

Comments are closed.