1737053076_maxresdefault.jpg

Shocking search history was revealed in the trial of Tim Bliefnick, a former Family Feud contestant accused of murdering his wife, Becky Bliefnick. The Illinois man’s alleged history showed searches about breaking into a home, cleaning up gunshot residue, and the number of police officers in the town of Quincy, where the murder was committed. Prosecutors alleged the 41-year-old nurse and mother of three was gunned down in February by Tim in the midst of a “contentious” divorce. The Law&Crime Daily team has the latest on this trial.

L&C Daily Hosted By:
Brian Buckmire: https://twitter.com/TheBuckEsq
Terri Austin: https://twitter.com/Terridaustin
Jesse Weber: https://twitter.com/jessecordweber

Producers:
Savannah Williamson
Heather Berzak: https://twitter.com/HeatherBerzakTV

#MurderTrial #Illinois #LawAndCrime

STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on YouTubeTV: https://bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime’s Daily Newsletter: https://bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3td2Iqo

LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lawandcrime/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/LawCrimeNetwork
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/lawandcrime
Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@lawandcrime

LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: https://lawandcrime.com/podcasts/

SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK YOUTUBE CHANNELS:
Main Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCz8K1occVvDTYDfFo7N5EZw
Law&Crime Shorts: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVXOqoOCYbi-iXChKAl6DTQ
Channel B: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXCLaaClAWQiTkl3pw9ZdLw
Channel C: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMV3pzWIhJGLYzoHyxBjjNw

source

46 thoughts on “Shocking Search History Revealed in Trial of Family Feud Contestant Accused of Killing Wife

  1. I HAVE PROOF THEIR DIVORCE ATTORNEY FRAUDULENTLY VACATED THEIR 01/19/23 DATE, AND IT BECAME ESSENTIALLY A PART OF HER MURDER! I WANT TO REPORT THIS!

  2. These wife killers always make me laugh. Did he really think that he could just kill his wife, take the kids, and walk off into the sunset without anyone getting suspicious, especially after leaving a trail of web searches and other incriminating evidence? What a dork.

  3. The sad thing is, she tried so hard to let everyone know what type of danger she was in and both family & friends didn't help her or the kids.
    I feel so bad for those children, they have no parents now.
    So tragic 💔💔😞

  4. I search that stuff on Google all the time. I mean, who doesn't wanna make a bunch of homemade pistol silencers? Searching "police response time" in conjunction with learning how to make a silencer…..now that's a little sketchy. I would have voted to convict on nothing but his Internet searches. Whew! Another genius criminal. Doh.

  5. I see an uncanny parallel between the court room's web search findings and Family Feud's actual game design…It's crazy how his seemingly comical response on the show haunts us now.

  6. this trial is so different from most trials I have seen. To me all of the answers from witnesses have been yes or no or correct. Isnt many of these questions leading. It does make the trial go faster

  7. I'm married now but if I wasn't, I wouldn't risk it again. Men are the biggest threat to women and husbands most of all. There's nothing wrong with good friends and the single life.

  8. If the husband had a phone lock on it, only he could be the one to have done the searches as described. That would be premeditated murder. Maybe the reason they didn't find the other 9mm was because he disposed of it in some body of water or in an area not traveled by many. Who can say. Just from what was, and what wasn't, mentioned here… I'd say he is guilty.

  9. Idk, is any of our search histories much better than that? I search some random questions that might look suspicious without context. For instance I searched “how to beat a GSR tests” just this morning because it was brought up in a homicide interrogation video I was watching. One suspect told the other “pee on your hands”. I just HAD to look that one up. Apparently he was on to something. The urine reacts with the saltpeter in gunpowder. Now God forbid I ever get falsely accused of something one day I’m gonna that in my search history.

  10. Here’s the deal. 99% of the time. The mother ( if she’s fit) is going to get custody. Fellows, you’ve got to abide with what the court decides. And, while I’m sure everyone has did the best they could for these diamonds!!!

  11. I don't see why people keep getting married its won't make you happy just bring you a lot of pain and stress in today's society self love is the best way to go

  12. “Our client’s case is full of reasonable doubt!” Ok, so who else killed his wife? Like… jfc it’s obvious

  13. Becky told so many people of her fears, and no one stepped up and spoke to authorities, her family or her bosses at work. Speaking up could have saved her life. That’s what friends are for. I even find it hard that to understand how some of the witnesses don’t wish to be seen. This is the last thing they can do for her, and they should be proud to step up now, even though it won’t save Becky, it honours her 🙏

  14. The internet search history is absolutely legendary. Why do these unhinged idiots think that it won’t come back and bite them. Two questions for the defense, does the phone have a password to open it and is it the defendants phone? Yes!

  15. Firing pin marks, along with loading and ejection marks can be as good as fingerprints at tying spent casings to the firearm that they were fired from. Also, spent casing can be tied to the production line in which said casing was produced. As in, the spent casings can be linked to the opened and partly used box of ammo they found in the guy's house if those casings at the scene did, in fact, come from the box they found at his house.

  16. Surprised the search didn't read, "how to k ill your wife and get away with it" and defese saying, yea it was his phone BUT we don't know if he was using his phone, right? 😅 Ridiculous, what if any evidence do you have that the victim didn't do the searches herself on his phone and shoy herself??? Sounds like they are pretty close to victim blame

  17. with the internet searches the odds in Vegas went from 2 to 1 for guilty to 1 for 2….. i.e. ….not good for the defense. The bookies/oddsmakers are rarely wrong.

  18. He may of well searched "How do I murder my soon to be ex-wife and avoid my internet searches from being read aloud in the court room"

Comments are closed.