COP MAKES UP HIS OWN LAWS – LAPD LT. FERRY – $331K/year DOESN’T UNDERSTAND HIPAA – DUI CHECKPOINT

35 thoughts on “COP MAKES UP HIS OWN LAWS – LAPD LT. FERRY – $331K/year DOESN’T UNDERSTAND HIPAA – DUI CHECKPOINT”

1. HIPAA LAW ENFORCEMENT SECRET WEAPON. A TOOL SO POWERFUL THEY DONT EVEN UNDERSTAND IT. NOT ONE

2. @27:05–"Bandit towing soliciting tows at accidents scenes is illegal" …Yet cops soliciting a trespass from business owners on 1A Auditors is Standard Operating Procedure.

3. He knows exactly what he’s doing. If you didn’t have a camera, he’d beat the hell out of you . Like they did to me.

4. It's not just medical professionals on the hook it's also "custodians" of medical records. Any one who has legal possession of the records

5. Did you ever get Ferry's ID number so we can email him?

6. Bandit toes lol.

7. What if the business card having the solid blue line under it wasn't an accident, but a way to have the blue line on it?🤔 🤣

8. Overpaid

9. Absolutely NOT EVER SEARCHING MY CARS.

10. lot of LEO's making bank doing nothing. for nothing but jack booting the public.

11. U can do weddings and bar mitzvahs lol

12. HIPAA replacement. Tragically HIPPA.

13. Quarter mill… My god, why didn't I become a fucking cop when I was a young guy..
    Oh yah, I own a soul.

    Unconscious btw

    And if no one else here I'd a Healthcare provider, no HIPPA violation is even possible.
    Next: if you think guy code I'd tough. Just get between 2 girls. Even if they don't know each other.

14. Unconscious threat because Ferry is an impulsive actor

15. 8:50 $$$$$ is the one and only purpose. You make a really good point about cops whining about being baited. They do it all day every day.

16. I really thought that guy that kept pounding his fist was going to get aggressive but I’m glad he didnt

17. Ferry looks like he is on coke

18. As someone grew up in an affluent neighborhood, I can answer your question. It is because the affluent have connections with DA's, judges, and access to expensive attorneys who can get deferments for their clients. This often means that the only money changing hands is to the DA's re-election campaign. Poor people are not so fortunate.

19. PDF SENT ME!!👀😂👀

20. I am convinced that all human beings have a Nazi gene, police uniforms reveal their Nazi gene! That’s a whole country, turned into Germany 1930!!!!!

21. Love your work hun 💙💙💙💙

    Most of the cops were respectful (even if it was passive aggressive), apart from the dumb Sgt. I actually liked the 2nd Sgt 👍

    Edited to say LOVED the Tom Z comment 😂🤣😂

22. 😎👀👍💜

23. Once more.. HIPAA is the responsibility of the record holder, not the viewer …

24. I often thought it was very funny that "ignorance of the law is not an defense" but if you ask a cop specifically about a law, the cops have no clue & no desire to find out.

25. How is it legal, that you have to let them drive your car? I don't get it. I thought cops opening your car door was a violation. Do the cops drive the car only if there is PC?

26. It’s such BS cops jacking someone up for not having their DL. It’s 2021, they can look it up in mere seconds…

27. "We are doing the best we can under the circumstances in public…" No, babe, you're not, because you created the circumstances, and if you were inconvenienced, you could just … change them. Everyone else is trying to cope, and you have all the power to solve your problems in legal ways, if only you care.

28. oh, so no drugs, defective vehicle items, warrants…just a drunk / carrying license dragnet?
    funny, since they can easily find out if a license exists, is suspended or revoked, with a phone call or app check, but they'd rather make someone be late for work, take time off for court, or have legal problems for years because they put the wrong pants on… Gawd I feel "protected & served! "

29. 331k salary and doesn't know the laws. That seems like negligence on the city/county and massive waste of taxpayer money. Earning the hate every day!

30. 5:20 Ask a cop if they're good to go, or giving a lawful order, and they will always say yes with complete confidence, regardless of whether or not it's actually true.

31. Another MARVELOUS clip, Mr. @johnny five o 😎🤙🏻💪🏻😎🇺🇸

    GARCIA still DID NOT have the right TO SEARCH THAT MAN'S vehicle, despite him having expired insurance/etc.

    PLAIN VIEW DOCTRINE simply explained 😎
    There are generally three requirements for the plain view doctrine:[1]
    the police officer must lawfully make an initial intrusion or otherwise properly be "lawfully positioned" where he can view a particular area;the officer must discover incriminating evidence "inadvertently", which is to say, he may not know in advance the location of certain evidence and intend to seize it, relying on the plain view doctrine only as a pretext;it must be "immediately apparent" to the police that the items they observe may be evidence of a crime, contraband, or otherwise subject to seizure. These requirements having been met, when police officers lawfully engaged in an activity in a particular area perceive a suspicious object, they may seize it immediately:
    It has been suggested that there is an additional step between the second and third step, requireing that "the evidence was in plain view in the sense that it was detected through the unaided use of the officer’s senses".[2]
    The first step requires that the officer "must be lawfully in the place and acting lawfully in the exercise of police powers when the officer discovers the evidence".[3]
    The requirement of "inadvertence" means that "it is not discovered by unauthorized search, but rather, because it is in the open when the police are lawfully in the place where it is visible, and lawfully exercising police duties". It does not apply where "officers discover the item through an unauthorized search."[4]
    The requirement of "immediately apparent" means that the office has "probable cause to associate the discovered property with criminal activity."[5]
    Plain View vs s. 489(2)
    Under s. 489(2), where an officer is in the execution of their duties, may without a warrant, seize anything that the officer has reasonable grounds to believe is obtained by, used for, or will afford evidence towards an offence. This power is separate and apart from the common law doctrine of plain view seizure.[6]

    Exceptions
    The doctrine does not apply to circumstances where police rely upon third-party reports of the contents of places otherwise protected by privacy. For example, a security guard reporting the contents of a bus station locker to police.[7]

    Exploratory vs Seizure Power
    The doctrine is not an exploratory search power, but rather is a seizure power.[8]

32. Lieutenant Flat Top

33. If they can see it in the car, it is in plain view. No warrant required.

34. shhhhh

35. Would of been great to see you drive through the check point and try and ask you for your license-edit- and also used some jack Daniels for aftershave

Comments are closed.