RE Upload- Spanking Olmos Park cop After The Ralley

This video is for news and education purposes
Buying awesome merch will help support the channel, AND get you some awesome product designs!

https://teespring.com/flag-of-tyranny?pid=2&cid=2397

** (Disclaimer: This video content is intended for educational and informational purposes only) **

Author: phillynews215

HOSTING BY PHILLYFINESTSERVERSTAT | ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS. POST QUESTION OR INQUIRIES SEND ME AN EMAIL TO PHILLYNEWSNOW215@GMAIL.COM (www.phillynewsnow.com)

48 thoughts on “RE Upload- Spanking Olmos Park cop After The Ralley

  1. LMAO First, lady and her husband (and dog) doesn't want to be filmed so they yell at people with cameras calling attention to themselves? Then 3 police units show up to tell them people that they are filming in public and NOT breaking any laws? Then they run away? LMAO

  2. I have been a gun owner for over half a century and none of them have ever committed a violent act. My many guns must all be defective. I must buy more.

  3. James is 100% correct on this, and I dont even have weapons, so I need to, and I understand the reality of safety. Their(the lady who called, or the one discussing this topic) safety is not an illusion, it is beyond that and is a delusion, because we see it over and over.
    One stat James has mentioned..How many people the police have killed vs terrorists. Regardless of the police shootings justifiable, as almost all or by defense ALL killings by police ARE justifiable. …The number of killings in 1 year is 9times that of ANY and ALL terrorist attacks in 15 YEARS. That should send shivers down your spine, PERIOD. We have taken bully thugs off the streets and put them in uniforms!

  4. Last comment…James an armed robber walks into a bank and sees me in line hes walking out before getting noticed. If we both have guns concealed its a powderkeg. No criminal (and if been a criminal) KNOWINGLY commits a crime in front of someone else with a gun thats just silly.

  5. "those who are willing to give up liberty for safety will have neither." this is true can you think of an example… North Korea

  6. This lady is a HUGE hypocrit… "I like to listen to both sides…"
    but she is not listening at all; only espousing her narrow perspective from her front porch and behind her guns.
    Chances are that hood has all white residents.

  7. So, the valley girls husband has tons of guns and ammo and all their neighbors except 1 also do….yet he's troubled by open carry if its a big black scary rifle? Im calling bullshit on this whole family. These people are the reason the left has ran rough-shot over our constitution. They dont even see their hypocrisy. These people are also the reason I will never consider moving to Texas or even recommend it. Come to Indiana, where freedom is much easier to see.

  8. I'm going to give that lady the benefit of the doubt. I think what she meant by "not wanting to protect my kids and wanting someone else to do it" is she doesn't want to be the one to shoot a perp. I'm guessing most normal gun owners don't want to shoot someone either, but we value the right to do so for self-defense.

  9. Jesus this woman talks like the exact opposite of what texans believe in. may as well be in fucking los Angeles

  10. I want to normalize guns too. She didn't articulate what the concern is, but it has a legitimate basis, regardless of the actual legitimacy. So let's steel-man her argument:

  11. My favorite new audit guy and i never thought i would hear u say lacrosse or see a lacrosse stick in the video haha ya boy is an all American and went to a school that was very good at it … the best sport but keep it up man respectttt

  12. Oh God, more rabid dogs on the loose. Hurry somebody they need to be put down 🐕‍🦺🐕‍🦺🐕‍🦺 heel, heel…

  13. If you want to challenge the interviewee you have other options than directly challenging her. You can also ask her what ideological opponents say. You don't have to narrow it to two sides, you don't have to encourage her to defend a position, and you can expose the most defensible point by demonstrating who is the most aware generally of different ideologies.

Comments are closed.